Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

FDA asks for feedback on streamlined "Quality-Metrics" program

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) presented a "scaled-down" plan for collecting quality metrics from drug manufacturers end of March. The docket is an attempt to reactivate previously paused efforts to collect manufacturing quality metrics data. The primary aim of the program is to mitigate potential drug shortages and promote improved quality management in the pharmaceutical industry.

Already in 2015 and 2016, the FDA published draft guidance on the subject, which was generally not well received by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Not only the high costs of collecting all this information, but also the enormous workload that would arise from it were criticised. Finally, industry was called upon to submit quality data on a voluntary basis. The FDA has now announced that it has learned from the shortcomings of the original collection plan, but of course also from the quality data that have been submitted in the meantime and the feedback from pharmaceutical manufacturers.

What's new in 2022?

The FDA plans to offer manufacturers the opportunity to select one or more quality metrics from each area that are meaningful and allow opportunities for continuous improvement. The FDA states that compliance with current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) requirements is the "minimum standard" for ensuring safety and efficacy. Still, cGMP does not necessarily indicate whether a manufacturer is investing in improvement and seeking sustained compliance, which is the state of consistent control over manufacturing performance and quality.

The FDA has identified four areas with could deliver appropriate individual quality metrics for reporting:

  • Manufacturing process performance:
    This can include the proportion of lots that were accepted in a given time period as well as the proportion of lots manufactured without a non-conformance.
  • Pharmaceutical quality system (PQS) effectiveness:
    This metric can include the effectiveness of the corrective action and prevention action (CAPA) which can cover the number of CAPAs initiated or closed on time.
  • Laboratory performance:
    This can include the proportion of laboratory test that are completed on schedule.
  • Supply chain robustness:
    This can include the extent to which shipments are delivered on-time and containing the correct quantity.

The FDA is seeking feedback and comments on the new programme proposal. The deadline t for commenting is set to 9 June 2022.


Source:

FDA: Quality Metrics website

 

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper announcing a targeted revision of Annex 6 Manufacture of Medicinal Gases of the EU GMP Guide. The last update dates from 2010. The revision aims to reflect current manufacturing practice, technological progress and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper outlining a targeted revision of Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation).

Read more
What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

The pharmaceutical industry in Germany and other countries, too, faces considerable challenges in the area of human resource management. These problems have far-reaching implications for the competitiveness and innovative power of the industry.

Read more
EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

The EMA has published a new reflection paper outlining its current thinking on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs). The paper addresses recommended approaches for evaluating the safety of new or increased impurity levels, particularly when such impurities exceed the ICH Q3A/Q3B qualification thresholds and are identified after completion of non-clinical toxicology studies.

Read more
EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

During the second industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on environmental risk assessment (ERA) for medicinal products for human use, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) addressed key implementation challenges observed during the first year of application.
Read more
Previous
Next