Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: ICH Q9 on Quality Risk Management in Step 2b

On 16 December 2021, EMA published the ICH Q9 draft document on Quality Risk Management (QRM) in step 2b. The draft provides important additional guidance on four specific areas:

  • the levels of subjectivity in risk assessments and in QRM outputs,
  • the product availability risks,
  • the lack of understanding as to what constitutes formality in QRM work, and
  • the lack of clarity on risk-based decision-making.

In more detail:

As stated in the document, subjectivity can directly impact the effectiveness of risk management activities and the decisions made. While subjectivity cannot be completely eliminated from quality risk management activities, it may be controlled with the proper use of quality risk management tools and maximising the use of relevant data and sources of knowledge.

An effective pharmaceutical quality system drives both supply chain robustness and sustainable GMP compliance. It also uses quality risk management and knowledge management to provide an early warning system. This includes

  • an internal and external manufacturing process variation and state of control
  • a robust facility infrastructure with suitable equipment and well-designed facilities
  • the use of modern technology, such as digitalization, automation, isolation technology
  • an effective monitoring strategy for supply chain partner performance

An understanding of formality in QRM can help to use resources more efficiently and can also support risk-based decision-making. This topic is addressed comprehensively, highlighting the fact that formality in quality risk management is not a binary concept (i.e. formal/informal), but includes varying degrees of formality. Those should be described within the quality system.

When formal QRM is applied, it should be complemented with structured decision-making. In general, higher levels of formality require higher levels of structure. Still, there can be varying degrees of structure with regard to approaches for risk-based decision-making.

The draft document is currently open for public consultation until 15 March 2022.


Source:

EMA: ICH guideline Q9 on quality risk management, Step 2b

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

News: EMA

EMA Clarifies Batch Numbering for Parallel-Traded Medicines

EMA updated its GMP/GDP Q&A collection by revising the answer to Question 4 concerning Chapter 5 of the EU GMP Guide. It explains which batch numbers should appear on the packaging of parallel-traded medicines.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

Why is it Important to use Consistent Microbiological Air Monitoring Methods in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Robust PDE reports form the basis of risk-based cleaning validation. This article highlights common deficiencies identified during GMP inspections and explains how they can be avoided.

Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: New Working Party on 3D-printed Medicinal Products

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) approved the creation of a working party on 3D-printed medicinal products. Its aim is to support the development of appropriate quality standards in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.).
Read more
EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

Appendix 1 of EMA’s Questions and Answers on nitrosamine impurities has been updated. This appendix contains acceptable intakes (AIs) established for N-nitrosamines.
Read more
WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO published a revised draft of its “WHO guidelines on quality risk management”. Working document QAS/26.994 is open for public comment until 15 November 2026.
Read more
Previous
Next