Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment. Positive elements include increased digitalisation of technical documentation, the use of EUDAMED and remote audits, and stronger early regulatory dialogue between manufacturers, Notified Bodies and expert panels. Measures to support innovation, such as regulatory sandboxes and dedicated pathways for orphan or breakthrough devices, are also welcomed.

At the same time, Team-NB expresses concerns that several proposed changes could reduce regulatory scrutiny, for example through fewer audits or reduced review of technical documentation. According to the organisation, this could ultimately affect patient safety and confidence in the regulatory system.

The association also considers the European Commission’s estimated €2.1 billion cost savings unrealistic, given that the total annual revenue of all Notified Bodies combined was €475 million in 2024.


Source:

Team-NB: Position Paper - MDR/IVDR revision: impact on the sector

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
EMA: New Q&A Clarify Regulatory Expectations on API Mixes

EMA: New Q&A Clarify Regulatory Expectations on API Mixes

New Q&A clarify how mixtures of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients (“API mixes”) should be handled from a regulatory perspective. An API mix is defined as a mixture of an API with one or more excipients and is considered the first step in the manufacture of a finished product.
Read more
EMA: New Guideline on Elemental Impurities in Veterinary Medicinal Products

EMA: New Guideline on Elemental Impurities in Veterinary Medicinal Products

The EMA has published the new Guideline on risk management requirements for elemental impurities in veterinary medicinal products (EMA/CVMP/426245/2023). It was developed to consolidate the existing documents on risk assessment and the management of elemental impurities in veterinary medicinal products into a single, clearly structured guideline.
Read more
Organic Impurities in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients – Nitrosamines

Organic Impurities in Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients – Nitrosamines

Since the unexpected discovery of N-nitrosamines in sartans in 2018, what began as isolated recalls has evolved into a permanent, lifecycle-wide compliance challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. With tightening EMA and FDA expectations, substance-specific limits, and intensified GMP scrutiny, companies must now proactively control nitrosamine risks.

Read more
Previous
Next