Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

In its Quality of Medicines Q&A – Part 1, the EMA has clarified how “novel or complex manufacturing processes” should be interpreted for variation categories Q.II.b.1 (new/replacement finished product manufacturing site) and Q.II.b.4 (change in batch size).

Such processes involve technologies that pose specific risks during site transfer or scale-up, potentially affecting product quality and thus requiring a Type II variation. Not all “non-standard processes” qualify as complex - aseptic processing, for example, is not considered complex for this classification, but as it is a non-standard manufacturing process, production scale process validation data is required.

Examples of complex processes include:

  • ATMPs, liposomal and nanoparticulate preparations,
  • Parenteral modified-release products,
  • Metered-dose inhalers and DPI,
  • Multilayer tablets.

Examples of novel processes include:

  • Continuous manufacturing, decentralised manufacturing,
  • Decentralised manufacturing
  • Additive manufacturing,
  • Use of process models,
  • Personalised medicine production.

Applicants submitting a Type IB variation must justify why the process is not novel or complex. If the justification is rejected, authorities may request withdrawal and resubmission as Type II. Pre-submission consultation and the use of Post Approval Change Management Protocols (PACMPs) can help ensure correct categorisation.


Source:

EMA: Quality of medicines questions and answers: Part 1

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next