Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of the Technical Interpretation for PQR

Swissmedic has published an updated version of its technical interpretation for a Product Quality Review (I-SMI.TI.14e).

This technical interpretation describes the minimal expectations as well as recommendations for establishing and evaluating a PQR, that inspectors of the competent regulatory authority can have when assessing compliance with the guidance during an inspection of a manufacturer of medicinal products, a manufacturer of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for medicinal products or a marketing authorisation holder, in order to assure a harmonized conduct of inspections.

The changes to the previous version are:

  • Added: finished product (FP), MAH, Responsible Person, and Therapeutic products act (TPA).
  • Defined: "responsible person."
  • Text refinements; data comparison with previous reviews required; CAPAs must be documented in the Pharmaceutical Quality System.
  • Clarified responsibilities for PQR establishment; textual refinements; ensured partial PQRs are accessible to the manufacturer/MAH.
  • Clarified PQR evaluation responsibilities; refined country-specific aspects, including batch rejection/release data, change controls, contract reviews, CAPA evaluations, and stability program checks. Included batches temporarily authorized by Swissmedic.
  • Introduced a new chapter on PQR process review responsibilities.
  • Created a separate chapter for Technical Agreements.
  • Reduced PQR interval from 5 to 3 years for low or no production cases.
  • Clarified PQR establishment timelines for manufacturers and MAHs.
  • Introduced a new chapter on parallel imported products.

Source:

Swissmedic: Technical Interpretation I-SMI.TI.14e


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be Interested in the Following Articles:

What are the quality requirements for pharmaceutical gases?

What are the quality requirements for pharmaceutical gases?

You can view the answer here:
Read more
EMA: Update on the Guideline “Stability Testing for Variations”

EMA: Update on the Guideline “Stability Testing for Variations”

The EMA has updated the guideline on stability testing for variations (Revision 3, applicable from 15 January 2026).
Read more
EU: Proposal for Simplification of Medical Device Rules

EU: Proposal for Simplification of Medical Device Rules

The European Commission has proposed targeted reforms to simplify the Medical Device Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/745, MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/746, IVDR) and to address structural implementation challenges.
Read more
EU: Proposal for a European Biotech Act

EU: Proposal for a European Biotech Act

The European Commission has presented a proposal for a European Biotech Act aimed at strengthening Europe’s biotechnology potential and accelerating the translation of innovation from the laboratory to the market.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper for the Revision of Annex 3 on Radiopharmaceuticals

EMA: Concept Paper for the Revision of Annex 3 on Radiopharmaceuticals

The EMA has published a concept paper outlining a future revision of Annex 3 (Manufacture of Radiopharmaceuticals) of the EU GMP Guidelines. The paper was developed in collaboration with PIC/S and adopted by the GMDP Inspectors Working Group (IWG) at its November meeting.

Read more
EMA: Q&A on QP Certification Without Physical EU Import

EMA: Q&A on QP Certification Without Physical EU Import

The EMA has published a new Q&A addressing QP certification for batches that are neither manufactured within the EU/EEA nor intended for the EU/EEA market, and that are not physically imported into the EU/EEA.

Read more
Previous
Next