Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of the Technical Interpretation for PQR

Swissmedic has published an updated version of its technical interpretation for a Product Quality Review (I-SMI.TI.14e).

This technical interpretation describes the minimal expectations as well as recommendations for establishing and evaluating a PQR, that inspectors of the competent regulatory authority can have when assessing compliance with the guidance during an inspection of a manufacturer of medicinal products, a manufacturer of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for medicinal products or a marketing authorisation holder, in order to assure a harmonized conduct of inspections.

The changes to the previous version are:

  • Added: finished product (FP), MAH, Responsible Person, and Therapeutic products act (TPA).
  • Defined: "responsible person."
  • Text refinements; data comparison with previous reviews required; CAPAs must be documented in the Pharmaceutical Quality System.
  • Clarified responsibilities for PQR establishment; textual refinements; ensured partial PQRs are accessible to the manufacturer/MAH.
  • Clarified PQR evaluation responsibilities; refined country-specific aspects, including batch rejection/release data, change controls, contract reviews, CAPA evaluations, and stability program checks. Included batches temporarily authorized by Swissmedic.
  • Introduced a new chapter on PQR process review responsibilities.
  • Created a separate chapter for Technical Agreements.
  • Reduced PQR interval from 5 to 3 years for low or no production cases.
  • Clarified PQR establishment timelines for manufacturers and MAHs.
  • Introduced a new chapter on parallel imported products.

Source:

Swissmedic: Technical Interpretation I-SMI.TI.14e


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

News: EMA

EMA Clarifies Batch Numbering for Parallel-Traded Medicines

EMA updated its GMP/GDP Q&A collection by revising the answer to Question 4 concerning Chapter 5 of the EU GMP Guide. It explains which batch numbers should appear on the packaging of parallel-traded medicines.

Read more
Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Robust PDE reports form the basis of risk-based cleaning validation. This article highlights common deficiencies identified during GMP inspections and explains how they can be avoided.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

Why is it Important to use Consistent Microbiological Air Monitoring Methods in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: New Working Party on 3D-printed Medicinal Products

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) approved the creation of a working party on 3D-printed medicinal products. Its aim is to support the development of appropriate quality standards in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.).
Read more
EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

Appendix 1 of EMA’s Questions and Answers on nitrosamine impurities has been updated. This appendix contains acceptable intakes (AIs) established for N-nitrosamines.
Read more
WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO published a revised draft of its “WHO guidelines on quality risk management”. Working document QAS/26.994 is open for public comment until 15 November 2026.
Read more
Previous
Next