Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of the Technical Interpretation for PQR

Swissmedic has published an updated version of its technical interpretation for a Product Quality Review (I-SMI.TI.14e).

This technical interpretation describes the minimal expectations as well as recommendations for establishing and evaluating a PQR, that inspectors of the competent regulatory authority can have when assessing compliance with the guidance during an inspection of a manufacturer of medicinal products, a manufacturer of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for medicinal products or a marketing authorisation holder, in order to assure a harmonized conduct of inspections.

The changes to the previous version are:

  • Added: finished product (FP), MAH, Responsible Person, and Therapeutic products act (TPA).
  • Defined: "responsible person."
  • Text refinements; data comparison with previous reviews required; CAPAs must be documented in the Pharmaceutical Quality System.
  • Clarified responsibilities for PQR establishment; textual refinements; ensured partial PQRs are accessible to the manufacturer/MAH.
  • Clarified PQR evaluation responsibilities; refined country-specific aspects, including batch rejection/release data, change controls, contract reviews, CAPA evaluations, and stability program checks. Included batches temporarily authorized by Swissmedic.
  • Introduced a new chapter on PQR process review responsibilities.
  • Created a separate chapter for Technical Agreements.
  • Reduced PQR interval from 5 to 3 years for low or no production cases.
  • Clarified PQR establishment timelines for manufacturers and MAHs.
  • Introduced a new chapter on parallel imported products.

Source:

Swissmedic: Technical Interpretation I-SMI.TI.14e


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper announcing a targeted revision of Annex 6 Manufacture of Medicinal Gases of the EU GMP Guide. The last update dates from 2010. The revision aims to reflect current manufacturing practice, technological progress and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper outlining a targeted revision of Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation).

Read more
Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

The pharmaceutical industry in Germany and other countries, too, faces considerable challenges in the area of human resource management. These problems have far-reaching implications for the competitiveness and innovative power of the industry.

Read more
What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

The EMA has published a new reflection paper outlining its current thinking on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs). The paper addresses recommended approaches for evaluating the safety of new or increased impurity levels, particularly when such impurities exceed the ICH Q3A/Q3B qualification thresholds and are identified after completion of non-clinical toxicology studies.

Read more
EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

During the second industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on environmental risk assessment (ERA) for medicinal products for human use, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) addressed key implementation challenges observed during the first year of application.
Read more
Previous
Next