Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of the Technical Interpretation for PQR

Swissmedic has published an updated version of its technical interpretation for a Product Quality Review (I-SMI.TI.14e).

This technical interpretation describes the minimal expectations as well as recommendations for establishing and evaluating a PQR, that inspectors of the competent regulatory authority can have when assessing compliance with the guidance during an inspection of a manufacturer of medicinal products, a manufacturer of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for medicinal products or a marketing authorisation holder, in order to assure a harmonized conduct of inspections.

The changes to the previous version are:

  • Added: finished product (FP), MAH, Responsible Person, and Therapeutic products act (TPA).
  • Defined: "responsible person."
  • Text refinements; data comparison with previous reviews required; CAPAs must be documented in the Pharmaceutical Quality System.
  • Clarified responsibilities for PQR establishment; textual refinements; ensured partial PQRs are accessible to the manufacturer/MAH.
  • Clarified PQR evaluation responsibilities; refined country-specific aspects, including batch rejection/release data, change controls, contract reviews, CAPA evaluations, and stability program checks. Included batches temporarily authorized by Swissmedic.
  • Introduced a new chapter on PQR process review responsibilities.
  • Created a separate chapter for Technical Agreements.
  • Reduced PQR interval from 5 to 3 years for low or no production cases.
  • Clarified PQR establishment timelines for manufacturers and MAHs.
  • Introduced a new chapter on parallel imported products.

Source:

Swissmedic: Technical Interpretation I-SMI.TI.14e


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next