Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of Responsible Person Requirements

Swissmedic published an updated version of Technical Interpretation 17: Responsible Person: requirements on 26 August 2024. The document outlines the Swiss Inspectorate’s understanding of an RP in accordance with the Medicinal Products Licensing Ordinance (MPLO). It can also serve as a reference for companies to assess whether an individual meets the criteria for applying to Swissmedic to act as an RP.

What’s new in Version 7.0?

  • Chapters 5.1 and 5.2 provide precise information about educational aspects and activities where experience in GDP/GMP practices is required.
  • The experience with regulatory issues as acceptable criterium has been removed and a precision about the experience required for an area with specific risks was added (e.g. sterile medicinal products)
  • It is specified that brokerage, agents, and trade in foreign countries do not count as GDP experience.
  • Language requirements are clarified in Chapter 5.5
  • Chapter 5.6. specifies the understanding of what is the direct supervision of a facility.
  • New Chapter 5.6.1 on remote technical and market release
  • Chapter 5.2 includes:
  • - Precisions about the expected presence on site of the RPs,
    - Precision of conditions permitting a reduction of physical presence on site,
    - Precision on the cases where an intensified presence on site is expected.
  • New Chapter on 5.6.3 about the workload of RPs
  • Chapter 6 clarifies that the same requirements apply to the deputy RP, inclusive domicile.
  • Chapter 7 specifies possibilities and conditions for task delegation as well as critical processes and release activities.
  • Chapter 8 includes the event of absence of the RP beyond the normal holiday leave.

In most cases, compliance with the previous technical interpretation guarantees compliance with the current version. The license holder is generally required to adapt immediately. Also, for the inspectorates the updated technical interpretation applies with immediate effect.

License holders with approved responsible persons who do not meet the requirements have 12 months to make the necessary adjustments. This could be either by appointing a new RP with the required language skills or by ensuring that an RP acquires the required language skills within this period. Swissmedic expects responsible persons to speak one of the official local languages of the canton where the inspection takes place and where the site is located.


Source:

Swissmedic: Technical interpretation 17 “Responsible Person: requirements”

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

News: EMA

EMA Clarifies Batch Numbering for Parallel-Traded Medicines

EMA updated its GMP/GDP Q&A collection by revising the answer to Question 4 concerning Chapter 5 of the EU GMP Guide. It explains which batch numbers should appear on the packaging of parallel-traded medicines.

Read more
Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Robust PDE reports form the basis of risk-based cleaning validation. This article highlights common deficiencies identified during GMP inspections and explains how they can be avoided.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

Why is it Important to use Consistent Microbiological Air Monitoring Methods in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: New Working Party on 3D-printed Medicinal Products

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) approved the creation of a working party on 3D-printed medicinal products. Its aim is to support the development of appropriate quality standards in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.).
Read more
EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

Appendix 1 of EMA’s Questions and Answers on nitrosamine impurities has been updated. This appendix contains acceptable intakes (AIs) established for N-nitrosamines.
Read more
WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO published a revised draft of its “WHO guidelines on quality risk management”. Working document QAS/26.994 is open for public comment until 15 November 2026.
Read more
Previous
Next