Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: FAQ on Pharmacovigilance Updated

On 25 September 2023, Swissmedic expanded a list of frequently asked questions for marketing authorisation holders submitting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports under the authority's pharmacovigilance program. The Swiss surveillance authority is thereby preparing manufacturers in its area of application for the additional documentation requirements in individual case reports, which will be mandatory from 1 January 2024.

The authority has defined different reporting requirements, which must be included in the report depending on the risk and familiarity of the ADR as follows:

  • For low-risk ADRs where the deviating effect is not listed on the drug label, information on "labelledness" is required in the Swiss Product Information (PI), or for ADRs not described there, additional information on "listdness" is required in the Company Core Safety Information (CCSI).
  • For serious ADRs whose adverse events are listed on the label, a "causality assessment" is required in the documentation. Details of the timing of the adverse events and possible alternative causes must be listed.
  • In high-risk cases, where the manufacturer reports a serious adverse event that is not listed on the product label, Swissmedic requires authorisation holders to submit proposals for risk-minimising measures in addition to the previously listed documentation.

Source:

Swissmedic: FAQ

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next