Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

IPEC: Updated Position Paper on Third Party Audits

The International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) Federation has released an update of its position paper advocating for independent third party audits and certification programs. The position paper was first published in September 2015.

Key Highlights:

  • Regulatory and Industry Challenges: Increasing regulatory demands require pharmaceutical manufacturers to source excipients from reputable suppliers, placing a significant audit burden on both suppliers and users.
  • Third-Party Auditing Benefits: Independent audits improve impartiality, enhance GMP compliance, and reduce the need for repetitive audits by multiple customers.
  • Certification Standards: Third-party audits follow internationally recognized standards, such as ISO 17021 and ISO 17065, ensuring credibility and consistency.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Certification schemes align with regulatory requirements, including the EU’s Falsified Medicines Directive and the U.S. FDA’s Safety and Innovation Act.
  • Industry-Wide Efficiency: Adoption of third-party certification helps reduce costs, resources, and time for both excipient suppliers and users.

According to IPEC, the use of third-party audit and certification schemes helps to reduce costs, time and resources for both excipient suppliers and users. Such third-party audit and certification schemes both raise quality expectations to an industry-accepted level and improve patient safety.


Source:

IPEC: News


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Q&A Paper on Measures to Prevent Microbial Contamination of Non-Sterile Medicinal Products

EMA: Q&A Paper on Measures to Prevent Microbial Contamination of Non-Sterile Medicinal Products

The EMA has published a new Q&A paper on technical and organisational measures to prevent microbial contamination of non-sterile medicinal products.
Read more
Why is import authorisation necessary for medicinal products entering the EU?

Why is import authorisation necessary for medicinal products entering the EU?

Read more
When APS Fail and First Air is at Risk

When APS Fail and First Air is at Risk

At the PDA Good Aseptic Manufacturing Conference 2026, Alberto Gonzales (Takeda) discussed challenges and practical solutions related to aseptic process simulations (APS). Anna Campanella (Takeda) and Hussein Bachir (Franz Ziel) explored how first air protection in aseptic processing can be compromised by equipment design, glove interventions, and operator activities.
Read more
FDA: Updated Compliance Program for Preapproval Inspections

FDA: Updated Compliance Program for Preapproval Inspections

The FDA has revised its Compliance Program 7346.832, “Preapproval Inspections”. The updated program describes the planning, conduct and evaluation of preapproval inspections (PAIs) for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs).
Read more
EMA: Revised Q&A MRA EU-USA

EMA: Revised Q&A MRA EU-USA

The EMA has updated its Questions and Answers on the EU-US Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA). The update follows the completion of the FDA's assessment of all EU authorities responsible for GMP inspections of veterinary medicinal products on 29 May 2026.
Read more
WHO: Draft on Regulatory Ovesight of Disposal of Medical Products

WHO: Draft on Regulatory Ovesight of Disposal of Medical Products

WHO published a draft consultation document on regulatory oversight of disposal of medical products throughout the lifecycle.
Read more
Previous
Next