Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

ICMRA: Authorities summarise global experiences on remote inspections

The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, ICMRA, has published a comprehensive reflection paper on experiences with different inspection models to maintain GCP and GMP inspections during the covid pandemic. The working group responsible for the paper was composed of representatives from various regulatory agencies around the world. To anticipate the group's conclusion: Remote inspections enable minimal regulatory oversight during the pandemic but will not be able to replace on-site inspections in the future.

Chaired by the UK MHRA, the working group gathered representatives from the US FDA, EMA, Health Canada and Swissmedic, German Pei, TGA Australia, PMDA Japan, ANVISA, Saudi FDA, WHO and regulators from Spain, Ireland, France, and Singapore.

The 15-page reflection paper Reflections on the regulatory experience of remote approaches to GCP and GMP regulatory oversight during the COVID-19 pandemic provides a good insight into the experiences that the different authorities have had with the new inspection models.  It offers answers to the question on whether and how they could be used in the future. According to the ICMRA, there are limitations.

It describes the experiences gained with

  • the decision-making processes for the use of remote inspections, based on a risk-based approach
  • the necessary technical requirements for remote use
  • the provision of documents, their access or even their provision duration
  • the possible logistical challenges
  • the training constraints for new inspectors
  • hybrid inspections

The paper concludes that some regulators from the working group are indeed looking at a future use of remote inspections, while others do not believe that the concept of remote inspections will be a permanent solution. Overall, remote and hybrid inspections are seen as an "additional tool" for inspections that may be used after the pandemic. But it is seen difficult to replace an inspector's on-site walk-through with visual technology.

"Although this document is a reflection paper and not a guidance document, the lessons learned provide valuable insight into how regulators have managed regulatory surveillance, inspections and assessments during the pandemic to support both COVID-19 management and GMP and GCP inspections in the normal course of business," so the UK MHRA, chair of the group.


Source:

ICMRA: Reflection Paper

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper announcing a targeted revision of Annex 6 Manufacture of Medicinal Gases of the EU GMP Guide. The last update dates from 2010. The revision aims to reflect current manufacturing practice, technological progress and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper outlining a targeted revision of Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation).

Read more
Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

The pharmaceutical industry in Germany and other countries, too, faces considerable challenges in the area of human resource management. These problems have far-reaching implications for the competitiveness and innovative power of the industry.

Read more
What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

The EMA has published a new reflection paper outlining its current thinking on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs). The paper addresses recommended approaches for evaluating the safety of new or increased impurity levels, particularly when such impurities exceed the ICH Q3A/Q3B qualification thresholds and are identified after completion of non-clinical toxicology studies.

Read more
EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

During the second industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on environmental risk assessment (ERA) for medicinal products for human use, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) addressed key implementation challenges observed during the first year of application.
Read more
Previous
Next