Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

ICH: Report of 2024 Implementation Survey

The ICH has published the 2024 Implementation Survey Report. It contains the results of a study aimed to monitor the adequacy of implementation and adherence to ICH Guidelines by regulatory authorities – continuing the assessment initiated in 2019 and repeated in 2021.

The results demonstrate that in general, there is a strong level of implementation and adherence across the agencies studied, as well as alignment between the perception of the companies and the self-declaration of authorities studied. 19 regulatory authorities (100% response rate) and 26 pharmaceutical companies (70% response rate) participated in the 2024 study to undertake gap analysis, indicating strong interest and support for this initiative.

The ICH summarises the results as follows:

Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members (e.g. ANVISA, Brazil, HSA, Singapore, MHRA, UK):

Results for 2024 indicate that:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines (only for ICH Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members): Implementation and adherence for Tier 2 Guidelines ranged from 40-100% across the ten authorities. Nine out of 10 authorities implemented and adhere to ≥80% of Tier 2 Guidelines. Some challenges for implementation and adherence were highlighted, particularly for M4, as well as E2B(R3), E2D and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: Implementation and adherence for Tier 3 Guidelines ranged from 5-95% across the ten authorities. Seven out of ten authorities implemented and adhere to ≥50% of Tier 3 Guidelines. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities included: Q4B, Q12, Q13; S1B(R1); E8(R1), E15, E16, E19 and, and M10.

The results also demonstrate progress made by authorities in implementing ICH Guidelines since the 2019 and 2021 assessment:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines: implementation and adherence increased from 47% in 2019, to 64% in 2021 and 73% in 2024. This was driven by an increase in implementation of E2B(R3) and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: the increase was from 70% in 2021 to 79% in 2024 (not studied in 2019). This was driven by an increase in implementation and adherence by ANVISA, Brazil; NMPA, China, and TITCK, Türkiye, which is now similar to the other Regulatory Members.

Founding and Standing Regulatory Members ((e.g. EC, Europe, FDA, United States, MHLW/PMDA, Japan): The results show for the selected Tier 3 Guidelines that implementation ranged from 86-100%, whereas adherence ranged from 28-86% across the five authorities. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities were E19, M10, Q13 and S1B(R1).

Regulatory Observers (ANMAT, Argentina, CECMED, Nigeria, SAHPRA, South Africa): The results show that implementation and adherence ranged from 33-100% across the three authorities.


Source:

ICH: News

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

How is a QRM process initiated?

How is a QRM process initiated?

You can view the answer here:
Read more
FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

The U.S. FDA has released an updated final guidance on preparing a Pre-Request for Designation (Pre-RFD), replacing the previous 2018 version. The revised document provides new recommendations for interacting with the Office of Combination Products (OCP) and clarifies expectations for Pre-RFD submissions.
Read more
EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

The EDQM has introduced a modular training programme covering chemically defined active substances and medicinal products. It will take place between 1 and 12 December 2025.
Read more
 Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data integrity is a key element in the pharmaceutical quality assurance system which has gained importance in recent years, especially from the viewpoint of the authorities. In GxP-regulated companies, managers are responsible for identifying and minimising risks to data integrity (“data governance”).

Read more
EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

In its Quality of Medicines Q&A – Part 1, the EMA has clarified how “novel or complex manufacturing processes” should be interpreted for variation categories Q.II.b.1 (new/replacement finished product manufacturing site) and Q.II.b.4 (change in batch size).
Read more
EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

The Environment Committee of the European Parliament has issued its opinion on the proposed EU Regulation to strengthen the availability of critical medicines. Key recommendations include fast-track permitting, simplified environmental assessments, and support for strategic manufacturing projects to boost EU production capacity.
Read more
Previous
Next