Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

ICH: Report of 2024 Implementation Survey

The ICH has published the 2024 Implementation Survey Report. It contains the results of a study aimed to monitor the adequacy of implementation and adherence to ICH Guidelines by regulatory authorities – continuing the assessment initiated in 2019 and repeated in 2021.

The results demonstrate that in general, there is a strong level of implementation and adherence across the agencies studied, as well as alignment between the perception of the companies and the self-declaration of authorities studied. 19 regulatory authorities (100% response rate) and 26 pharmaceutical companies (70% response rate) participated in the 2024 study to undertake gap analysis, indicating strong interest and support for this initiative.

The ICH summarises the results as follows:

Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members (e.g. ANVISA, Brazil, HSA, Singapore, MHRA, UK):

Results for 2024 indicate that:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines (only for ICH Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members): Implementation and adherence for Tier 2 Guidelines ranged from 40-100% across the ten authorities. Nine out of 10 authorities implemented and adhere to ≥80% of Tier 2 Guidelines. Some challenges for implementation and adherence were highlighted, particularly for M4, as well as E2B(R3), E2D and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: Implementation and adherence for Tier 3 Guidelines ranged from 5-95% across the ten authorities. Seven out of ten authorities implemented and adhere to ≥50% of Tier 3 Guidelines. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities included: Q4B, Q12, Q13; S1B(R1); E8(R1), E15, E16, E19 and, and M10.

The results also demonstrate progress made by authorities in implementing ICH Guidelines since the 2019 and 2021 assessment:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines: implementation and adherence increased from 47% in 2019, to 64% in 2021 and 73% in 2024. This was driven by an increase in implementation of E2B(R3) and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: the increase was from 70% in 2021 to 79% in 2024 (not studied in 2019). This was driven by an increase in implementation and adherence by ANVISA, Brazil; NMPA, China, and TITCK, Türkiye, which is now similar to the other Regulatory Members.

Founding and Standing Regulatory Members ((e.g. EC, Europe, FDA, United States, MHLW/PMDA, Japan): The results show for the selected Tier 3 Guidelines that implementation ranged from 86-100%, whereas adherence ranged from 28-86% across the five authorities. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities were E19, M10, Q13 and S1B(R1).

Regulatory Observers (ANMAT, Argentina, CECMED, Nigeria, SAHPRA, South Africa): The results show that implementation and adherence ranged from 33-100% across the three authorities.


Source:

ICH: News

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Annex 22: EMA Workshop on AI in GMP

Annex 22: EMA Workshop on AI in GMP

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) will hold a two-day multistakeholder workshop on 30 June and 1 July 2026 to gather expert input for the development of Annex 22 of the EU GMP Guide on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicines manufacturing.
Read more
FDA: Pilot Program for One-Day Inspectional Assessments

FDA: Pilot Program for One-Day Inspectional Assessments

Since April 2026, the U.S. FDA has been piloting “One-Day Inspectional Assessments” as a complement to standard FDA inspections.
Read more
EU: Commission Implementing Regulation on QM and Conformity Assessment Activities of Notified Bodies

EU: Commission Implementing Regulation on QM and Conformity Assessment Activities of Notified Bodies

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/977 of 4 May 2026 further specifies requirements for notified bodies under the MDR and IVDR frameworks and aims to promote a more harmonised implementation across the European Union.
Read more
The ABC of User Requirements Specification (URS)

The ABC of User Requirements Specification (URS)

In the URS, the future user defines what the system should be capable of, but also what it is limited to. In addition to the (testable!) technical requirements, regulatory require-ments should also be taken into account.
Read more
What is the Importance of Data Integrity?

What is the Importance of Data Integrity?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EDQM: Updated Guideline on CEP Revisions and Renewals

EDQM: Updated Guideline on CEP Revisions and Renewals

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare has published a revised version of its guideline on the revision and renewal of Certificates of Suitability (CEPs) (PA/PH/CEP (04) 02), aligning it with recent EU legislation on variation procedures.
Read more
Previous
Next