Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

ICH: Report of 2024 Implementation Survey

The ICH has published the 2024 Implementation Survey Report. It contains the results of a study aimed to monitor the adequacy of implementation and adherence to ICH Guidelines by regulatory authorities – continuing the assessment initiated in 2019 and repeated in 2021.

The results demonstrate that in general, there is a strong level of implementation and adherence across the agencies studied, as well as alignment between the perception of the companies and the self-declaration of authorities studied. 19 regulatory authorities (100% response rate) and 26 pharmaceutical companies (70% response rate) participated in the 2024 study to undertake gap analysis, indicating strong interest and support for this initiative.

The ICH summarises the results as follows:

Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members (e.g. ANVISA, Brazil, HSA, Singapore, MHRA, UK):

Results for 2024 indicate that:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines (only for ICH Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members): Implementation and adherence for Tier 2 Guidelines ranged from 40-100% across the ten authorities. Nine out of 10 authorities implemented and adhere to ≥80% of Tier 2 Guidelines. Some challenges for implementation and adherence were highlighted, particularly for M4, as well as E2B(R3), E2D and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: Implementation and adherence for Tier 3 Guidelines ranged from 5-95% across the ten authorities. Seven out of ten authorities implemented and adhere to ≥50% of Tier 3 Guidelines. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities included: Q4B, Q12, Q13; S1B(R1); E8(R1), E15, E16, E19 and, and M10.

The results also demonstrate progress made by authorities in implementing ICH Guidelines since the 2019 and 2021 assessment:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines: implementation and adherence increased from 47% in 2019, to 64% in 2021 and 73% in 2024. This was driven by an increase in implementation of E2B(R3) and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: the increase was from 70% in 2021 to 79% in 2024 (not studied in 2019). This was driven by an increase in implementation and adherence by ANVISA, Brazil; NMPA, China, and TITCK, Türkiye, which is now similar to the other Regulatory Members.

Founding and Standing Regulatory Members ((e.g. EC, Europe, FDA, United States, MHLW/PMDA, Japan): The results show for the selected Tier 3 Guidelines that implementation ranged from 86-100%, whereas adherence ranged from 28-86% across the five authorities. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities were E19, M10, Q13 and S1B(R1).

Regulatory Observers (ANMAT, Argentina, CECMED, Nigeria, SAHPRA, South Africa): The results show that implementation and adherence ranged from 33-100% across the three authorities.


Source:

ICH: News

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next