Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

ICH: Report of 2024 Implementation Survey

The ICH has published the 2024 Implementation Survey Report. It contains the results of a study aimed to monitor the adequacy of implementation and adherence to ICH Guidelines by regulatory authorities – continuing the assessment initiated in 2019 and repeated in 2021.

The results demonstrate that in general, there is a strong level of implementation and adherence across the agencies studied, as well as alignment between the perception of the companies and the self-declaration of authorities studied. 19 regulatory authorities (100% response rate) and 26 pharmaceutical companies (70% response rate) participated in the 2024 study to undertake gap analysis, indicating strong interest and support for this initiative.

The ICH summarises the results as follows:

Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members (e.g. ANVISA, Brazil, HSA, Singapore, MHRA, UK):

Results for 2024 indicate that:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines (only for ICH Non-Founding, Non-Standing Regulatory Members): Implementation and adherence for Tier 2 Guidelines ranged from 40-100% across the ten authorities. Nine out of 10 authorities implemented and adhere to ≥80% of Tier 2 Guidelines. Some challenges for implementation and adherence were highlighted, particularly for M4, as well as E2B(R3), E2D and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: Implementation and adherence for Tier 3 Guidelines ranged from 5-95% across the ten authorities. Seven out of ten authorities implemented and adhere to ≥50% of Tier 3 Guidelines. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities included: Q4B, Q12, Q13; S1B(R1); E8(R1), E15, E16, E19 and, and M10.

The results also demonstrate progress made by authorities in implementing ICH Guidelines since the 2019 and 2021 assessment:

  • For Tier 2 Guidelines: implementation and adherence increased from 47% in 2019, to 64% in 2021 and 73% in 2024. This was driven by an increase in implementation of E2B(R3) and M1.
  • For Tier 3 Guidelines: the increase was from 70% in 2021 to 79% in 2024 (not studied in 2019). This was driven by an increase in implementation and adherence by ANVISA, Brazil; NMPA, China, and TITCK, Türkiye, which is now similar to the other Regulatory Members.

Founding and Standing Regulatory Members ((e.g. EC, Europe, FDA, United States, MHLW/PMDA, Japan): The results show for the selected Tier 3 Guidelines that implementation ranged from 86-100%, whereas adherence ranged from 28-86% across the five authorities. Guidelines with least implementation and adherence across the authorities were E19, M10, Q13 and S1B(R1).

Regulatory Observers (ANMAT, Argentina, CECMED, Nigeria, SAHPRA, South Africa): The results show that implementation and adherence ranged from 33-100% across the three authorities.


Source:

ICH: News

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

ICH: Updated Q9(R1) Briefing Pack

ICH: Updated Q9(R1) Briefing Pack

The ICH has fully revised the Q9(R1) Briefing Pack (March/April 2026) to align with the updated ICH Q9 guideline.
Read more
EMA: New Plans for the EU GMP Guide

EMA: New Plans for the EU GMP Guide

EMA published the GMDP Inspectors Working Group’s new 2026-2028 work plan and its 2025 annual report.
Read more
EMA: Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) Effectiveness Pilot Project

EMA: Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) Effectiveness Pilot Project

EMA launched a pilot under which EEA GMP inspectors will assess how sites demonstrate the effectiveness of their pharmaceutical quality system for risk-based change management, and whether the EEA GMP certificate could serve as the main evidence of this effectiveness.
Read more
EMA: Updated Guideline on Active Substance Chemistry

EMA: Updated Guideline on Active Substance Chemistry

The EMA has updated guidance on the information required for the manufacture and control of active substances used in medicinal products, with a 1 September 2026 date of application.
Read more
EMA: Q&A on the Implementation of 3DP Technology for Solid Oral Dosage Forms

EMA: Q&A on the Implementation of 3DP Technology for Solid Oral Dosage Forms

EMA added a new GMP/Q&A section on its website and published a dedicated Q&A document on 3D printing (3DP) for solid oral dosage forms.
Read more
Microbiological Monitoring – Sources of Contamination

Microbiological Monitoring – Sources of Contamination

All pharmaceutical dosage forms must be manufactured under controlled microbiological conditions. This requires microbial monitoring. This applies not only to sterile manufacturing, but also to facilities that manufacture non-sterile products.
Read more
Previous
Next