Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: Update of Q&As for Nitrosamine Impurities

The EMA has updated its Q&As for marketing authorisation holders and applicants regarding nitrosamine impurities in human medicinal products. This is revision 23.

Q&A 22 has been updated to clarify the timeframe for applying the higher interim limit during CAPA implementation. Question 22 is: What is the approach to control presence of N-nitrosamine exceeding the acceptable intake (AI) during CAPA implementation? 

The described approach to accept higher interim limits is applicable to all authorised products that have CAPA implementation timeline of up to 3 years from the date of publication of the initial AI. 

The revised paragraph in the answer now reads: 

The approach is not applicable to the below instances where other approaches may be considered on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the appropriate regulatory authority: 

  • CAPA implementation exceeding 3 years from the date of publication of the initial AI (this date which starts the 3-years period will not change if the AI is subsequently revised, even in case of publication of more restrictive AI). In cases where CAPAs are not implemented within the agreed timeframe please refer to Q&A 20 for the regulatory steps taken by authorities. 
  • New/ongoing regulatory applications.


Source:

EMA: What’s New?

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next