Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: Q&A on Remote Batch Certification and QP Residency

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published four new questions and answers around Remote Batch Certification/Confirmation of a Qualified Person (QP). One Q&A deals with the residence specification for a QP. They apply to EU/EEA QP certification or QP confirmation, as described in EU GMP, and specifically in Annex 16. It applies to the manufacture and importation of human and veterinary medicinal products and investigational medicinal products.

As EMA explains in Q&A 1, remote batch certification may be allowed if accepted by the national regulatory authority where the authorised site is located. Some competent authorities may have specific requirements regarding the implementation of remote batch certification/batch confirmation on a routine basis. Manufacturers and QPs should ensure that they comply with any applicable local requirements. In order to determine what requirements apply, manufacturers should consult with their national competent authority.

Q&A 2 describes the requirements that have to be fulfilled if remote certification is granted, such as:

  • QP certification/confirmation should take place within the EU/EEA (or Northern Ireland) in all cases. This should be demonstrated by technical means.
  • QPs are obliged to maintain their knowledge in relation to the products, manufacturing processes, and pharmaceutical quality systems. QPs must also be satisfied that their ongoing reliance on the relevant pharmaceutical quality system is well-founded. The QP must be able to demonstrate to the competent authority knowledge of the product and the manufacturing processes for which they are responsible. This should include time spent physically on-site as applicable.
  • Where remote QP certification/confirmation is employed on a routine basis, it must be described and controlled within the pharmaceutical quality system and relevant detailed site procedures should be in place. In Member States where the use of contract QPs (i.e. a person who is not an employee of the manufacturer but conducting QP activities under the manufacturer’s authorisation) is permitted, the technical agreement between the MIA holder and the QP should also mention remote certification/confirmation, and specify the circumstances under which the QP must attend the site.
  • The QP should have access to all information (data and computer system applications) that are necessary according to Annex 16 to make a decision on batch certification/confirmation.
  • The MIA holder should provide the required facilities to enable QPs to carry out their functions remotely. This includes the equipment and support required to enable electronic batch certification/confirmation and completion of the batch certification register remotely. IT systems used for remote batch release should comply with the requirements of EU GMP Annex 11.

Consideration should also be given to ensuring that the technical requirements for remote certification regarding IT security and data integrity are met. Details on this are listed in Q&A 3.

EMA explains in Q&A 4 that EU legislation does not currently impose harmonised requirements on the place of residence of qualified persons. However, it is noted that different national requirements may apply in some Member States.


Source:

EMA: Guidance on GMP and GDP: Q&As

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

How is a QRM process initiated?

How is a QRM process initiated?

You can view the answer here:
Read more
FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

The U.S. FDA has released an updated final guidance on preparing a Pre-Request for Designation (Pre-RFD), replacing the previous 2018 version. The revised document provides new recommendations for interacting with the Office of Combination Products (OCP) and clarifies expectations for Pre-RFD submissions.
Read more
EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

The EDQM has introduced a modular training programme covering chemically defined active substances and medicinal products. It will take place between 1 and 12 December 2025.
Read more
 Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data integrity is a key element in the pharmaceutical quality assurance system which has gained importance in recent years, especially from the viewpoint of the authorities. In GxP-regulated companies, managers are responsible for identifying and minimising risks to data integrity (“data governance”).

Read more
EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

In its Quality of Medicines Q&A – Part 1, the EMA has clarified how “novel or complex manufacturing processes” should be interpreted for variation categories Q.II.b.1 (new/replacement finished product manufacturing site) and Q.II.b.4 (change in batch size).
Read more
EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

The Environment Committee of the European Parliament has issued its opinion on the proposed EU Regulation to strengthen the availability of critical medicines. Key recommendations include fast-track permitting, simplified environmental assessments, and support for strategic manufacturing projects to boost EU production capacity.
Read more
Previous
Next