Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: Q&A on Remote Batch Certification and QP Residency

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has published four new questions and answers around Remote Batch Certification/Confirmation of a Qualified Person (QP). One Q&A deals with the residence specification for a QP. They apply to EU/EEA QP certification or QP confirmation, as described in EU GMP, and specifically in Annex 16. It applies to the manufacture and importation of human and veterinary medicinal products and investigational medicinal products.

As EMA explains in Q&A 1, remote batch certification may be allowed if accepted by the national regulatory authority where the authorised site is located. Some competent authorities may have specific requirements regarding the implementation of remote batch certification/batch confirmation on a routine basis. Manufacturers and QPs should ensure that they comply with any applicable local requirements. In order to determine what requirements apply, manufacturers should consult with their national competent authority.

Q&A 2 describes the requirements that have to be fulfilled if remote certification is granted, such as:

  • QP certification/confirmation should take place within the EU/EEA (or Northern Ireland) in all cases. This should be demonstrated by technical means.
  • QPs are obliged to maintain their knowledge in relation to the products, manufacturing processes, and pharmaceutical quality systems. QPs must also be satisfied that their ongoing reliance on the relevant pharmaceutical quality system is well-founded. The QP must be able to demonstrate to the competent authority knowledge of the product and the manufacturing processes for which they are responsible. This should include time spent physically on-site as applicable.
  • Where remote QP certification/confirmation is employed on a routine basis, it must be described and controlled within the pharmaceutical quality system and relevant detailed site procedures should be in place. In Member States where the use of contract QPs (i.e. a person who is not an employee of the manufacturer but conducting QP activities under the manufacturer’s authorisation) is permitted, the technical agreement between the MIA holder and the QP should also mention remote certification/confirmation, and specify the circumstances under which the QP must attend the site.
  • The QP should have access to all information (data and computer system applications) that are necessary according to Annex 16 to make a decision on batch certification/confirmation.
  • The MIA holder should provide the required facilities to enable QPs to carry out their functions remotely. This includes the equipment and support required to enable electronic batch certification/confirmation and completion of the batch certification register remotely. IT systems used for remote batch release should comply with the requirements of EU GMP Annex 11.

Consideration should also be given to ensuring that the technical requirements for remote certification regarding IT security and data integrity are met. Details on this are listed in Q&A 3.

EMA explains in Q&A 4 that EU legislation does not currently impose harmonised requirements on the place of residence of qualified persons. However, it is noted that different national requirements may apply in some Member States.


Source:

EMA: Guidance on GMP and GDP: Q&As

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: New Q&A Clarify Regulatory Expectations on API Mixes

EMA: New Q&A Clarify Regulatory Expectations on API Mixes

New Q&A clarify how mixtures of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients (“API mixes”) should be handled from a regulatory perspective. An API mix is defined as a mixture of an API with one or more excipients and is considered the first step in the manufacture of a finished product.
Read more
Previous
Next