Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: New Q&A on nitrosamine impurities for marketing authorisation holders

Shortly after the publication of the EMA's final assessment report on nitrosamine impurities in medicinal products (we reported), a 15-page Q&A for marketing authorisation holders and applicants was published on 6 August 2020.

It replaces the document 'Information on nitrosamines for marketing authorisation holders' EMA/428592/2019 published in September 2019, which was withdrawn.   

 

The 18 questions and answers on the topic of "risk assessment" deal with the expectations that will be placed on marketing authorisation holders and applicants in the future. They are intended to

  • design their manufacturing processes and controls to prevent if possible or mitigate as much as possible the presence of N-nitrosamines in their API and FP(s); 
  • assess the risk of presence nitrosamine impurities in their API(s) and FP(s) and introduce any resultant changes to the dossier as needed (e.g. changes to their manufacturing processes); 
  • ensure that active substances and excipients used in their FPs are manufactured in compliance with good manufacturing practices in line with Article 46(f) of Directive 2001/83/EC. 

 

What's new?

While in September 2019 the "Call for Review" concentrated on impurities in chemically synthesized active pharmaceutical ingredients, biological APIs must now also be reviewed. In particular these are

  • biologicals containing chemically synthesised fragments, where risk factors similar to chemically synthesised active substances are present;
  • biologicals using processes where nitrosating reagents are deliberately added;  
  • biologicals packaged in certain primary packaging material, such as blister packs containing nitrocellulose. 

The "Call for Review" is divided into three steps.:

  • Step 1: Risk evaluation   
  • Step 2: If a risk exists, confirmatory tests must be performed and the results must be reported immediately.  
  • Step 3: If the presence of nitrosamines is confirmed, variations to reduce the risk should be submitted.  

 

Important deadlines for marketing authorisation holders to submit the results from step 1: 

  • for products containing chemically synthesised APIs: until 31 March 2021  
  • for products containing biological APIs: until 1 July 2021 

 

The Q&A also provides answers to questions on the following points:  

  • Currently known causes for the presence of nitrosamines 
  • Procedure after completion of steps 1 and 2 if new information becomes available   
  • Prioritization of certain factors in the risk assessment 
  • Performance of the risk assessment 
  • Conduction of the confirmatory tests 
  • Requirements for the analytical methods 
  • Limits for nitrosamines 
  • What-To-Do after detection of nitrosamine contamination 
  • Mitigation measures 
  • Changes required for marketing authorisations 
  • Procedure for new and existing marketing authorisation applications 
  • Information on the time of inclusion of a test for nitrosamines in the authorisation dossier 
  • Responsibilities of marketing authorisation holders for active substances with Certificates of Suitability (CEPs) and Active Substance Master Files (ASMFs)

Sources:

EMA: Nitrosamine Website

EMA: Questions and answers for marketing authorisation holders/applicants on the CHMP Opinion for the Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 referral on nitrosamine impurities in human medicinal products

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic has revised its guidance document “GMP compliance by foreign manufacturers”. The new Version 7.0 has been valid since 7 September 2026. In particular, it introduces new provisions for demonstrating the GMP compliance of manufacturers inspected by the US FDA. 
Read more
Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic has revised its Technical Interpretation “Market release and distribution in cooperation with a pre-wholesaler”. The document addresses market release and distribution where a Marketing Authorisation Holder works with a pre-wholesaler (logistics and distribution service provider).
Read more
News: Europe

IPEC Updates Two Guides on Pharmaceutical Excipients

The IPEC Federation has updated two key guides on pharmaceutical excipients. The IPEC Composition Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients (Version 3, 2026) describes an approach for manufacturers to establish excipient composition profiles. The revised version now covers biotechnology- and fermentation-derived excipients, provides further details on component types and physicochemical characterisation, and includes an example composition profile template.
Read more
Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in GMP-regulated environments, presenting companies with new regulatory challenges. This article summarizes the latest regulatory developments, introduces a validation framework based on the FDA's seven-step model, and outlines initial practical experience with AI/ML validation.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

What are the General Requirements for Standard Documents?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: Revised Guidance on Sister File Applications

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) has revised its Guidance on applications for “sister files” (PA/PH/CEP (09) 141). The revision is intended to support consistent application of the procedure and provide greater clarity on the classification and assessment of the corresponding CEP applications.
Read more
Previous
Next