Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: New Q&A for Co-Processed Excipients

The EMA has published new Questions & Answers on co-processed excipients (CoPEs) used in solid oral dosage forms, introducing a harmonised, risk-based regulatory approach applicable to human and veterinary medicines.

What are co-processed excipients?
Co-processed excipients are combinations of two or more Ph. Eur. excipients processed together using a physical process (e.g. spray-drying), without formation of covalent bonds. They provide specific functionalities that cannot be achieved by simple blending. CoPEs are not considered novel excipients nor intermediates.

What are the risks?
Compared to single excipients, CoPEs may introduce additional risks, including:

  • increased material variability
  • impact on critical quality attributes (CQAs) such as dissolution, stability or bioavailability
  • higher complexity in analytical control and manufacturing robustness

Risk categories and risk assessment
The EMA defines three risk categories:

  • Category A – high risk
  • Category B – medium risk
  • Category C – low risk

Classification is based on a comprehensive risk assessment, considering:

  • function of the CoPE in the finished product
  • impact on CQAs and critical process parameters
  • number of excipients in the CoPE
  • proportion of the CoPE in the formulation

Risk assessment should follow ICH Q9 principles. For human medicines, alignment with the Formalised Risk Assessment (FRA) for ascertaining the appropriate good manufacturing practice for excipients is expected. The FRA does not need to be submitted in the dossier but should be available to inspectors during GMP inspections.


Source:

EMA: Questions and answers regarding co-processed excipients used in solid oral dosage forms

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

News: EMA

EMA Clarifies Batch Numbering for Parallel-Traded Medicines

EMA updated its GMP/GDP Q&A collection by revising the answer to Question 4 concerning Chapter 5 of the EU GMP Guide. It explains which batch numbers should appear on the packaging of parallel-traded medicines.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

Why is it Important to use Consistent Microbiological Air Monitoring Methods in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Robust PDE reports form the basis of risk-based cleaning validation. This article highlights common deficiencies identified during GMP inspections and explains how they can be avoided.

Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: New Working Party on 3D-printed Medicinal Products

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) approved the creation of a working party on 3D-printed medicinal products. Its aim is to support the development of appropriate quality standards in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.).
Read more
EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

Appendix 1 of EMA’s Questions and Answers on nitrosamine impurities has been updated. This appendix contains acceptable intakes (AIs) established for N-nitrosamines.
Read more
WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO published a revised draft of its “WHO guidelines on quality risk management”. Working document QAS/26.994 is open for public comment until 15 November 2026.
Read more
Previous
Next