Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: ICH Q9 on Quality Risk Management in Step 2b

On 16 December 2021, EMA published the ICH Q9 draft document on Quality Risk Management (QRM) in step 2b. The draft provides important additional guidance on four specific areas:

  • the levels of subjectivity in risk assessments and in QRM outputs,
  • the product availability risks,
  • the lack of understanding as to what constitutes formality in QRM work, and
  • the lack of clarity on risk-based decision-making.

In more detail:

As stated in the document, subjectivity can directly impact the effectiveness of risk management activities and the decisions made. While subjectivity cannot be completely eliminated from quality risk management activities, it may be controlled with the proper use of quality risk management tools and maximising the use of relevant data and sources of knowledge.

An effective pharmaceutical quality system drives both supply chain robustness and sustainable GMP compliance. It also uses quality risk management and knowledge management to provide an early warning system. This includes

  • an internal and external manufacturing process variation and state of control
  • a robust facility infrastructure with suitable equipment and well-designed facilities
  • the use of modern technology, such as digitalization, automation, isolation technology
  • an effective monitoring strategy for supply chain partner performance

An understanding of formality in QRM can help to use resources more efficiently and can also support risk-based decision-making. This topic is addressed comprehensively, highlighting the fact that formality in quality risk management is not a binary concept (i.e. formal/informal), but includes varying degrees of formality. Those should be described within the quality system.

When formal QRM is applied, it should be complemented with structured decision-making. In general, higher levels of formality require higher levels of structure. Still, there can be varying degrees of structure with regard to approaches for risk-based decision-making.

The draft document is currently open for public consultation until 15 March 2022.


Source:

EMA: ICH guideline Q9 on quality risk management, Step 2b

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper announcing a targeted revision of Annex 6 Manufacture of Medicinal Gases of the EU GMP Guide. The last update dates from 2010. The revision aims to reflect current manufacturing practice, technological progress and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper outlining a targeted revision of Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation).

Read more
Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

The pharmaceutical industry in Germany and other countries, too, faces considerable challenges in the area of human resource management. These problems have far-reaching implications for the competitiveness and innovative power of the industry.

Read more
What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

The EMA has published a new reflection paper outlining its current thinking on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs). The paper addresses recommended approaches for evaluating the safety of new or increased impurity levels, particularly when such impurities exceed the ICH Q3A/Q3B qualification thresholds and are identified after completion of non-clinical toxicology studies.

Read more
EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

During the second industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on environmental risk assessment (ERA) for medicinal products for human use, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) addressed key implementation challenges observed during the first year of application.
Read more
Previous
Next