Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: Guidance on Sampling Excipients at High Risk of Glycol Contamination

In its Q&A section on GMP and GDP, EMA has added questions and answers on additional guidance to Annex 8 on sampling excipients at risk of glycol contamination, emphasising stringent measures for high-risk substances. In seven key questions, EMA highlights the risks of diethylene glycol (DEG) and ethylene glycol (EG) contamination, emphasising the responsibilities of manufacturers and supply chain management.

The EMA clarifies that sampling only part of the containers is generally not possible when brokers or intermediaries are involved in the supply chain, as the supply chain is too complex and long in these cases. Companies sourcing excipients with a high risk of DEG/EG contamination are urged to demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the supply chains and to implement robust quality risk management practices.

The EMA discusses the European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) DEG/EG limit test, noting its limitations for a large number of containers due to its gas chromatographic method. Alternative tests are being investigated, but the current method remains the official standard for confirming compliance.

The EMA emphasises compliance with European Pharmacopoeia monographs to ensure adequate control of DEG/EG contamination risks. Compliance is verified during GMP inspections.


Source:

EMA: Guidance on good manufacturing practice and good distribution practice: Questions and answers

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic has revised its guidance document “GMP compliance by foreign manufacturers”. The new Version 7.0 has been valid since 7 September 2026. In particular, it introduces new provisions for demonstrating the GMP compliance of manufacturers inspected by the US FDA. 
Read more
Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic has revised its Technical Interpretation “Market release and distribution in cooperation with a pre-wholesaler”. The document addresses market release and distribution where a Marketing Authorisation Holder works with a pre-wholesaler (logistics and distribution service provider).
Read more
News: Europe

IPEC Updates Two Guides on Pharmaceutical Excipients

The IPEC Federation has updated two key guides on pharmaceutical excipients. The IPEC Composition Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients (Version 3, 2026) describes an approach for manufacturers to establish excipient composition profiles. The revised version now covers biotechnology- and fermentation-derived excipients, provides further details on component types and physicochemical characterisation, and includes an example composition profile template.
Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

What are the General Requirements for Standard Documents?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in GMP-regulated environments, presenting companies with new regulatory challenges. This article summarizes the latest regulatory developments, introduces a validation framework based on the FDA's seven-step model, and outlines initial practical experience with AI/ML validation.

Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: Revised Guidance on Sister File Applications

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) has revised its Guidance on applications for “sister files” (PA/PH/CEP (09) 141). The revision is intended to support consistent application of the procedure and provide greater clarity on the classification and assessment of the corresponding CEP applications.
Read more
Previous
Next