Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: Further update of Q&A on regulatory GMP-requirements during COVID-19

The European Commission, the EMA and the European Network of Medicines Regulatory Authorities have published the third version of the Q&A on regulatory expectations for medicinal products for human use during the COVID-19 pandemic on July 1, 2020. The document has meanwhile grown from originally 7 to now 23 pages and intends to serve pharmaceutical companies as a guide on current adjustments to the regulatory framework due to COVID-19.

 

What's new?


Question 2.2, on the validity period of GMP certificates for manufacturing/importing sites of APIs and/or finished products has been updated.
For pharmaceutical sites within the EEA:

  • The validity of GMP certificates will be automatically extended until the end of 2021 without any further action by the certificate holder. This automatic extension does not apply to changes in the scope of the GMP certificate (e.g. new buildings, new medicinal products). However, it also applies to the validity of time-limited authorisations/registrations, which should also be automatically extended until the end of 2021. Changes to the scope of application are not included here, either.
  • For new sites/facilities that have never been inspected and approved, a distant assessment can be conducted as a first step. If the result is positive, a certificate may then be issued. An on-site inspection should be carried out as soon as circumstances permit. If the result is negative, a time stop will be triggered until an on-site inspection is possible.

For pharmaceutical sites outside the EEA:

  • In principle, the same conditions apply as for sites within the EEA, unless the issuing/supervisory authority takes measures that affect the validity of the certificate. Here, too, new sites/plants are subject to the possibility of a remote assessment by an EEA supervisory authority, in case no corresponding mutual agreement (MRA) exists.
  • Pre-authorisations or routine on-site inspections should be resumed as soon as the COVID-19 restrictions are lifted.

It is emphasised that manufacturers and importers remain obliged to comply fully with all GMP requirements.

Questions 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 on pharmacovigilance measures are new.

  • Question 4.2 deals with the management of corrective and preventive actions. These should be duly recorded as soon as identified and addressed and closed when circumstances permit so.
  • Question 4.3 explains that quality system audits should be carried out regularly and on a risk-based basis. Delays in conducting audits during the pandemic should be well justified and documented and should be resumed as soon as possible. Alternative means such as remote audits should be considered (e.g. telephone calls or video conferences). Utilising questionnaires alone, without supporting evidence, would not be accepted as audits.
  • Question 4.4 deals with on-site inspections. These may not be possible due to travel bans, restrictions on access to facilities or additional health risks for inspectors and inspectors. A remote inspection may also be carried out during pharmacovigilance inspections. Whether it is feasible and whether all technical requirements, e.g. remote access to electronic systems, are met, has to be clarified in advance.

 
As a marketing authorisation holder you should regularly check this EMA-page for new information.


Source:

EMA: Q&A

EMA: COVID-19: What's new?

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic has revised its guidance document “GMP compliance by foreign manufacturers”. The new Version 7.0 has been valid since 7 September 2026. In particular, it introduces new provisions for demonstrating the GMP compliance of manufacturers inspected by the US FDA. 
Read more
Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic has revised its Technical Interpretation “Market release and distribution in cooperation with a pre-wholesaler”. The document addresses market release and distribution where a Marketing Authorisation Holder works with a pre-wholesaler (logistics and distribution service provider).
Read more
News: Europe

IPEC Updates Two Guides on Pharmaceutical Excipients

The IPEC Federation has updated two key guides on pharmaceutical excipients. The IPEC Composition Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients (Version 3, 2026) describes an approach for manufacturers to establish excipient composition profiles. The revised version now covers biotechnology- and fermentation-derived excipients, provides further details on component types and physicochemical characterisation, and includes an example composition profile template.
Read more
Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in GMP-regulated environments, presenting companies with new regulatory challenges. This article summarizes the latest regulatory developments, introduces a validation framework based on the FDA's seven-step model, and outlines initial practical experience with AI/ML validation.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

What are the General Requirements for Standard Documents?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: Revised Guidance on Sister File Applications

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) has revised its Guidance on applications for “sister files” (PA/PH/CEP (09) 141). The revision is intended to support consistent application of the procedure and provide greater clarity on the classification and assessment of the corresponding CEP applications.
Read more
Previous
Next