Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

In its Quality of Medicines Q&A – Part 1, the EMA has clarified how “novel or complex manufacturing processes” should be interpreted for variation categories Q.II.b.1 (new/replacement finished product manufacturing site) and Q.II.b.4 (change in batch size).

Such processes involve technologies that pose specific risks during site transfer or scale-up, potentially affecting product quality and thus requiring a Type II variation. Not all “non-standard processes” qualify as complex - aseptic processing, for example, is not considered complex for this classification, but as it is a non-standard manufacturing process, production scale process validation data is required.

Examples of complex processes include:

  • ATMPs, liposomal and nanoparticulate preparations,
  • Parenteral modified-release products,
  • Metered-dose inhalers and DPI,
  • Multilayer tablets.

Examples of novel processes include:

  • Continuous manufacturing, decentralised manufacturing,
  • Decentralised manufacturing
  • Additive manufacturing,
  • Use of process models,
  • Personalised medicine production.

Applicants submitting a Type IB variation must justify why the process is not novel or complex. If the justification is rejected, authorities may request withdrawal and resubmission as Type II. Pre-submission consultation and the use of Post Approval Change Management Protocols (PACMPs) can help ensure correct categorisation.


Source:

EMA: Quality of medicines questions and answers: Part 1

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

The IPEC Stability Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients has been updated and is now available as version 3 (2026), as announced on the IPEC (International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council) website.

Read more
EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

On 14 July 2026, the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) published a comprehensive briefing on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as ‘forever chemicals’. The document is intended to serve as a technical basis for MEPs in their upcoming political decisions on PFAS regulation and summarises the current state of scientific knowledge, regulation and procedures.

Read more
Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

The GMP-compliant handover of computerised systems to operations is a critical step in the Computer System Validation (CSV) lifecycle. Beyond go-live and hypercare, clearly defined responsibilities, comprehensive documentation and well-trained personnel are essential to maintaining a validated state throughout routine operation.
Read more
How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

Here's the answer:
Read more
APIC: Publishes Updated “How to Do” Document for GDP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

APIC: Publishes Updated “How to Do” Document for GDP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee (APIC) has published Version 3 of the document “GDP for APIs: How to Do” (June 2026) on its website. The document provides practical guidance on implementing Good Distribution Practice for active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Read more
TGA: Seeks Feedback on Planned Adoption of 11 International Scientific Guidelines

TGA: Seeks Feedback on Planned Adoption of 11 International Scientific Guidelines

Australia's regulatory authority, the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration), pursues a strategy of aligning its regulatory approaches as closely as possible with comparable international standards. These include the regulatory requirements of the EU, the FDA and the ICH. In this context, around 370 international scientific guidelines have already been adopted.

Read more
Previous
Next