Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: EMA

EMA: 2 New Q&As on Third Party Audits of API Suppliers

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated guidance on GMP and GDP. The EMA has added two questions and answers on the basic requirements for active substances used as starting material in relation to third party audits.

1.     Is an audit performed by a third-party acceptable?

According to Union procedures and Article 46(f) of Directive 2001/83/EC, manufacturing authorisation holders (MIA holders) must ensure GMP compliance of their active substance suppliers – either through their own audits or via third-party auditors under appropriate contractual arrangements.

Key points include:

  • Audits by MIA holders must be integrated into the quality system, conducted by qualified personnel, and well-documented.
  • Third-party audits are permissible, provided Chapter 7 of the EU GMP guidelines is followed and contracts ensure clear roles and responsibilities.
  • Conflict of interest (CoI) management is essential: MIA holders must ensure any CoIs are declared, assessed for impact, and documented.
  • Potential CoIs may include personal or financial ties, prior employment with the audited company, or commercial interests in audit outcomes.
  • Quality systems should support audit integrity, and QPs must evaluate CoI declarations during final audit report assessments.
  • These principles also apply to joint audits, where multiple MIA holders share audit arrangements, assuming mutual interest in the active substance.

2.    What are the expectations for the content of written final assessment of third-party audit reports?

Qualified Persons (QPs) bear the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that third-party audit reports are properly evaluated. A written final assessment must clearly summarize this evaluation and be available for review by authorities upon request.
The assessment should cover all relevant aspects of the audit process and report, including:

  • Verification of contractual arrangements
  • Audit scope, duration, and frequency
  • Competence of the auditors in relation to the audit’s scope
  • Evaluation of CAPAs and their follow-up
  • Consideration of any conflicts of interest

Source:

EMA: Guidance on good manufacturing practice and good distribution practice: Questions and answers


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic Updates Guidance on GMP Compliance of Foreign Manufacturers

Swissmedic has revised its guidance document “GMP compliance by foreign manufacturers”. The new Version 7.0 has been valid since 7 September 2026. In particular, it introduces new provisions for demonstrating the GMP compliance of manufacturers inspected by the US FDA. 
Read more
Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic Updates Requirements for Cooperation with Pre-Wholesalers

Swissmedic has revised its Technical Interpretation “Market release and distribution in cooperation with a pre-wholesaler”. The document addresses market release and distribution where a Marketing Authorisation Holder works with a pre-wholesaler (logistics and distribution service provider).
Read more
News: Europe

IPEC Updates Two Guides on Pharmaceutical Excipients

The IPEC Federation has updated two key guides on pharmaceutical excipients. The IPEC Composition Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients (Version 3, 2026) describes an approach for manufacturers to establish excipient composition profiles. The revised version now covers biotechnology- and fermentation-derived excipients, provides further details on component types and physicochemical characterisation, and includes an example composition profile template.
Read more
Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Applying the FDA’s 7-Step Model for AI/ML Validation in GMP Environments: One Year Later

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in GMP-regulated environments, presenting companies with new regulatory challenges. This article summarizes the latest regulatory developments, introduces a validation framework based on the FDA's seven-step model, and outlines initial practical experience with AI/ML validation.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

What are the General Requirements for Standard Documents?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: Revised Guidance on Sister File Applications

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) has revised its Guidance on applications for “sister files” (PA/PH/CEP (09) 141). The revision is intended to support consistent application of the procedure and provide greater clarity on the classification and assessment of the corresponding CEP applications.
Read more
Previous
Next