Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: 2 New Q&As on Third Party Audits of API Suppliers

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated guidance on GMP and GDP. The EMA has added two questions and answers on the basic requirements for active substances used as starting material in relation to third party audits.

1.     Is an audit performed by a third-party acceptable?

According to Union procedures and Article 46(f) of Directive 2001/83/EC, manufacturing authorisation holders (MIA holders) must ensure GMP compliance of their active substance suppliers – either through their own audits or via third-party auditors under appropriate contractual arrangements.

Key points include:

  • Audits by MIA holders must be integrated into the quality system, conducted by qualified personnel, and well-documented.
  • Third-party audits are permissible, provided Chapter 7 of the EU GMP guidelines is followed and contracts ensure clear roles and responsibilities.
  • Conflict of interest (CoI) management is essential: MIA holders must ensure any CoIs are declared, assessed for impact, and documented.
  • Potential CoIs may include personal or financial ties, prior employment with the audited company, or commercial interests in audit outcomes.
  • Quality systems should support audit integrity, and QPs must evaluate CoI declarations during final audit report assessments.
  • These principles also apply to joint audits, where multiple MIA holders share audit arrangements, assuming mutual interest in the active substance.

2.    What are the expectations for the content of written final assessment of third-party audit reports?

Qualified Persons (QPs) bear the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that third-party audit reports are properly evaluated. A written final assessment must clearly summarize this evaluation and be available for review by authorities upon request.
The assessment should cover all relevant aspects of the audit process and report, including:

  • Verification of contractual arrangements
  • Audit scope, duration, and frequency
  • Competence of the auditors in relation to the audit’s scope
  • Evaluation of CAPAs and their follow-up
  • Consideration of any conflicts of interest

Source:

EMA: Guidance on good manufacturing practice and good distribution practice: Questions and answers


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA: Revision of Annex 6 - Manufacture of Medicinal Gases

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper announcing a targeted revision of Annex 6 Manufacture of Medicinal Gases of the EU GMP Guide. The last update dates from 2010. The revision aims to reflect current manufacturing practice, technological progress and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more
EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA: Concept Paper on the Revision of Annex 15

EMA and PIC/S have published a concept paper outlining a targeted revision of Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation).

Read more
Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

Human Resource Management as a Key to Success

The pharmaceutical industry in Germany and other countries, too, faces considerable challenges in the area of human resource management. These problems have far-reaching implications for the competitiveness and innovative power of the industry.

Read more
What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

What do Typical Manufacturing Processes for Sterile Products look like?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

EMA: Reflection Paper on the Qualification of Non-Mutagenic Impurities (NMIs)

The EMA has published a new reflection paper outlining its current thinking on the qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (NMIs). The paper addresses recommended approaches for evaluating the safety of new or increased impurity levels, particularly when such impurities exceed the ICH Q3A/Q3B qualification thresholds and are identified after completion of non-clinical toxicology studies.

Read more
EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

EMA: Discussions on the Revised ERA Guideline

During the second industry stakeholder webinar on the revised guideline on environmental risk assessment (ERA) for medicinal products for human use, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) addressed key implementation challenges observed during the first year of application.
Read more
Previous
Next