Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EMA: 2 New Q&As on Third Party Audits of API Suppliers

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has updated guidance on GMP and GDP. The EMA has added two questions and answers on the basic requirements for active substances used as starting material in relation to third party audits.

1.     Is an audit performed by a third-party acceptable?

According to Union procedures and Article 46(f) of Directive 2001/83/EC, manufacturing authorisation holders (MIA holders) must ensure GMP compliance of their active substance suppliers – either through their own audits or via third-party auditors under appropriate contractual arrangements.

Key points include:

  • Audits by MIA holders must be integrated into the quality system, conducted by qualified personnel, and well-documented.
  • Third-party audits are permissible, provided Chapter 7 of the EU GMP guidelines is followed and contracts ensure clear roles and responsibilities.
  • Conflict of interest (CoI) management is essential: MIA holders must ensure any CoIs are declared, assessed for impact, and documented.
  • Potential CoIs may include personal or financial ties, prior employment with the audited company, or commercial interests in audit outcomes.
  • Quality systems should support audit integrity, and QPs must evaluate CoI declarations during final audit report assessments.
  • These principles also apply to joint audits, where multiple MIA holders share audit arrangements, assuming mutual interest in the active substance.

2.    What are the expectations for the content of written final assessment of third-party audit reports?

Qualified Persons (QPs) bear the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that third-party audit reports are properly evaluated. A written final assessment must clearly summarize this evaluation and be available for review by authorities upon request.
The assessment should cover all relevant aspects of the audit process and report, including:

  • Verification of contractual arrangements
  • Audit scope, duration, and frequency
  • Competence of the auditors in relation to the audit’s scope
  • Evaluation of CAPAs and their follow-up
  • Consideration of any conflicts of interest

Source:

EMA: Guidance on good manufacturing practice and good distribution practice: Questions and answers


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

How is a QRM process initiated?

How is a QRM process initiated?

You can view the answer here:
Read more
FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

FDA: Updated Pre-RFD Guidance for Combination Products

The U.S. FDA has released an updated final guidance on preparing a Pre-Request for Designation (Pre-RFD), replacing the previous 2018 version. The revised document provides new recommendations for interacting with the Office of Combination Products (OCP) and clarifies expectations for Pre-RFD submissions.
Read more
EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

EDQM: 9 Virtual Training Modules on Ph. Eur. and CEPs

The EDQM has introduced a modular training programme covering chemically defined active substances and medicinal products. It will take place between 1 and 12 December 2025.
Read more
 Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data Integrity and Data Governance

Data integrity is a key element in the pharmaceutical quality assurance system which has gained importance in recent years, especially from the viewpoint of the authorities. In GxP-regulated companies, managers are responsible for identifying and minimising risks to data integrity (“data governance”).

Read more
EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

EMA Clarifies “Novel or Complex Manufacturing Process” Definition

In its Quality of Medicines Q&A – Part 1, the EMA has clarified how “novel or complex manufacturing processes” should be interpreted for variation categories Q.II.b.1 (new/replacement finished product manufacturing site) and Q.II.b.4 (change in batch size).
Read more
EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

EU: Environment Committee Comments on EU Regulation Regarding Critical Medicines

The Environment Committee of the European Parliament has issued its opinion on the proposed EU Regulation to strengthen the availability of critical medicines. Key recommendations include fast-track permitting, simplified environmental assessments, and support for strategic manufacturing projects to boost EU production capacity.
Read more
Previous
Next