Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC: Updated Q&A on Safety Features, Version 19

The European Commission published Version 19 of the Q&A on safety features for medicinal products in late December 2021.

What's new?

  • Question 1.29: Do the unique identifiers of reference and retention samples taken from stock in compliance with Annex 19 of the EU GMP Guidelines5 and uploaded to the EMVS have to be decommissioned? If yes, to what status?
    Answer: Yes, if a sample of a batch is taken as reference or retention sample after uploading in EMVS, it should be decommissioned as "sample". If a sample is taken voluntarily by a wholesaler that fall outside the scope of Annex 19, they should be decommissioned as "destroyed".

What has been updated?

  • Question 1.22: In the case of parallel-traded packs, can parallel traders cover or remove the safety features of the original pack?
  • Answer:
    Yes. Parallel traders who cover or remove the existing safety features are required to apply equivalent safety features in accordance with Article 47a of Directive 2001/83/EC. If the product code or/and batch number change, the original one must be decommissioned as a first step. The new individual identifier should comply with the requirements of the Member State where the medicinal product is to be placed on the market. In any case, traceability must be maintained in the final storage system.

 

  • Question 5.8: Can a wholesaler request another wholesaler to verify the authenticity and decommission the unique identifiers for medicinal products they intend to distribute outside the EU on their behalf?
    Answer: No, this obligation cannot be delegated, as the audit trail would not reflect the reality of the supply chain.

 

  • Question 7.19: Can a marketing authorisation holder delegate the uploading of the information laid down in Article 33(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161?
    Answer: Yes, this is possible if there is a written agreement between both parties. However, the legal responsibility will remain with the MAH. He must ensure the accuracy, confidentiality, and integrity of the data uploaded into the system.

Source:

EC: Q&A Safety Features, Version 19

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Assessing Container Closure Systems for Drugs and Biologics

FDA: Draft Guidance on Assessing Container Closure Systems for Drugs and Biologics

On 14 August 2026, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the publication of a new draft guidance document entitled ‘Container Closure Systems for Human Drugs and Biological Products’.

Read more
FDA: New FDA Commissioner Dr. Heidi Overton

FDA: New FDA Commissioner Dr. Heidi Overton

President Donald Trump has named White House aide Heidi Overton to lead the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Overton will fill the position previously held by Marty Makary, who left the agency in May. This announcement was made on Trump's Truth Social account on 19 August. Her nomination is subject to confirmation by the Senate.

Read more
IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

The IPEC Stability Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients has been updated and is now available as version 3 (2026), as announced on the IPEC (International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council) website.

Read more
EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

On 14 July 2026, the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) published a comprehensive briefing on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as ‘forever chemicals’. The document is intended to serve as a technical basis for MEPs in their upcoming political decisions on PFAS regulation and summarises the current state of scientific knowledge, regulation and procedures.

Read more
How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

The GMP-compliant handover of computerised systems to operations is a critical step in the Computer System Validation (CSV) lifecycle. Beyond go-live and hypercare, clearly defined responsibilities, comprehensive documentation and well-trained personnel are essential to maintaining a validated state throughout routine operation.
Read more
Previous
Next