Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC: Q&A Information on Interruption or Discontinuation of Supply of Medical Devices

The European Commission has published a Q&A on practical aspects related to the implementation of the Article 10a obligation in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply of certain devices as introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR).

This Q&A document is intended to facilitate the application of the above mentioned regulations as regards a gradual roll-out of Eudamed, the obligation to inform in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply, and transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices.


Summary of the Q&As:

  • Implementation Date: Article 10a obligations begin January 10, 2025. Interruptions anticipated before this date do not require reporting but may be voluntarily shared.
  • Scope of Obligation: Manufacturers, including those outside the EU, must inform relevant parties about anticipated supply interruptions. This applies to all devices (excluding custom-made devices) if supply issues could cause harm to patients or public health.
  • Obliged Parties to Inform: Manufacturers are required to notify economic operators, competent authorities, and healthcare institutions or professionals they directly supply. Economic operators must ensure that this information is passed further downstream without alteration.
  • Timing of Notification: Typically, manufacturers must notify at least six months before an anticipated supply interruption unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: Unexpected events like natural disasters, raw material shortages, or financial challenges may allow manufacturers to notify with less than six months’ notice.
  • Defining Supply Interruptions: An interruption of supply should be understood as having a temporary inability to place individual devices of a given model or type on the Union market, with an expected duration of more than 60 days, as a general indication.
  • Reasons for Interruption: Manufacturers must specify reasons, which could include regulatory, manufacturing, supply chain, or business-related causes.
  • Risk of Serious Harm: Manufacturers must assess whether an interruption could cause serious harm, such as health risks or treatment delays, based on the device’s role and patient impact.
  • Data Confidentiality: Information provided to competent authorities is governed by MDR/IVDR confidentiality rules, although authorities may need to share details with healthcare entities.
  • Information Submission:I Notifications should be submitted using the forthcoming Manufacturer Information Form, and countries may provide specific submission instructions.
  • Responsibilities of Economic Operators: Economic operators who receive notification must share it promptly and unchanged with other relevant entities, such as healthcare institutions, to allow timely planning.
  • Application to System Packs: For devices used within system or procedure packs, manufacturers must inform relevant parties in the supply chain, who must then notify healthcare providers.

Source:

EC: Public Health - Latest Updates

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

IPEC: Stability Guide for Excipients has been Updated

The IPEC Stability Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients has been updated and is now available as version 3 (2026), as announced on the IPEC (International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council) website.

Read more
EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

On 14 July 2026, the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) published a comprehensive briefing on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as ‘forever chemicals’. The document is intended to serve as a technical basis for MEPs in their upcoming political decisions on PFAS regulation and summarises the current state of scientific knowledge, regulation and procedures.

Read more
Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

Handover of Computerised Systems to the Operating Department

The GMP-compliant handover of computerised systems to operations is a critical step in the Computer System Validation (CSV) lifecycle. Beyond go-live and hypercare, clearly defined responsibilities, comprehensive documentation and well-trained personnel are essential to maintaining a validated state throughout routine operation.
Read more
How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

How is the Effectiveness of CAPAs Verified?

Here's the answer:
Read more
APIC: Publishes Updated “How to Do” Document for GDP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

APIC: Publishes Updated “How to Do” Document for GDP for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients

The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee (APIC) has published Version 3 of the document “GDP for APIs: How to Do” (June 2026) on its website. The document provides practical guidance on implementing Good Distribution Practice for active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Read more
TGA: Seeks Feedback on Planned Adoption of 11 International Scientific Guidelines

TGA: Seeks Feedback on Planned Adoption of 11 International Scientific Guidelines

Australia's regulatory authority, the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration), pursues a strategy of aligning its regulatory approaches as closely as possible with comparable international standards. These include the regulatory requirements of the EU, the FDA and the ICH. In this context, around 370 international scientific guidelines have already been adopted.

Read more
Previous
Next