Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC: Q&A Information on Interruption or Discontinuation of Supply of Medical Devices

The European Commission has published a Q&A on practical aspects related to the implementation of the Article 10a obligation in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply of certain devices as introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR).

This Q&A document is intended to facilitate the application of the above mentioned regulations as regards a gradual roll-out of Eudamed, the obligation to inform in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply, and transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices.


Summary of the Q&As:

  • Implementation Date: Article 10a obligations begin January 10, 2025. Interruptions anticipated before this date do not require reporting but may be voluntarily shared.
  • Scope of Obligation: Manufacturers, including those outside the EU, must inform relevant parties about anticipated supply interruptions. This applies to all devices (excluding custom-made devices) if supply issues could cause harm to patients or public health.
  • Obliged Parties to Inform: Manufacturers are required to notify economic operators, competent authorities, and healthcare institutions or professionals they directly supply. Economic operators must ensure that this information is passed further downstream without alteration.
  • Timing of Notification: Typically, manufacturers must notify at least six months before an anticipated supply interruption unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: Unexpected events like natural disasters, raw material shortages, or financial challenges may allow manufacturers to notify with less than six months’ notice.
  • Defining Supply Interruptions: An interruption of supply should be understood as having a temporary inability to place individual devices of a given model or type on the Union market, with an expected duration of more than 60 days, as a general indication.
  • Reasons for Interruption: Manufacturers must specify reasons, which could include regulatory, manufacturing, supply chain, or business-related causes.
  • Risk of Serious Harm: Manufacturers must assess whether an interruption could cause serious harm, such as health risks or treatment delays, based on the device’s role and patient impact.
  • Data Confidentiality: Information provided to competent authorities is governed by MDR/IVDR confidentiality rules, although authorities may need to share details with healthcare entities.
  • Information Submission:I Notifications should be submitted using the forthcoming Manufacturer Information Form, and countries may provide specific submission instructions.
  • Responsibilities of Economic Operators: Economic operators who receive notification must share it promptly and unchanged with other relevant entities, such as healthcare institutions, to allow timely planning.
  • Application to System Packs: For devices used within system or procedure packs, manufacturers must inform relevant parties in the supply chain, who must then notify healthcare providers.

Source:

EC: Public Health - Latest Updates

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next