Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC: Q&A Information on Interruption or Discontinuation of Supply of Medical Devices

The European Commission has published a Q&A on practical aspects related to the implementation of the Article 10a obligation in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply of certain devices as introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR).

This Q&A document is intended to facilitate the application of the above mentioned regulations as regards a gradual roll-out of Eudamed, the obligation to inform in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply, and transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices.


Summary of the Q&As:

  • Implementation Date: Article 10a obligations begin January 10, 2025. Interruptions anticipated before this date do not require reporting but may be voluntarily shared.
  • Scope of Obligation: Manufacturers, including those outside the EU, must inform relevant parties about anticipated supply interruptions. This applies to all devices (excluding custom-made devices) if supply issues could cause harm to patients or public health.
  • Obliged Parties to Inform: Manufacturers are required to notify economic operators, competent authorities, and healthcare institutions or professionals they directly supply. Economic operators must ensure that this information is passed further downstream without alteration.
  • Timing of Notification: Typically, manufacturers must notify at least six months before an anticipated supply interruption unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: Unexpected events like natural disasters, raw material shortages, or financial challenges may allow manufacturers to notify with less than six months’ notice.
  • Defining Supply Interruptions: An interruption of supply should be understood as having a temporary inability to place individual devices of a given model or type on the Union market, with an expected duration of more than 60 days, as a general indication.
  • Reasons for Interruption: Manufacturers must specify reasons, which could include regulatory, manufacturing, supply chain, or business-related causes.
  • Risk of Serious Harm: Manufacturers must assess whether an interruption could cause serious harm, such as health risks or treatment delays, based on the device’s role and patient impact.
  • Data Confidentiality: Information provided to competent authorities is governed by MDR/IVDR confidentiality rules, although authorities may need to share details with healthcare entities.
  • Information Submission:I Notifications should be submitted using the forthcoming Manufacturer Information Form, and countries may provide specific submission instructions.
  • Responsibilities of Economic Operators: Economic operators who receive notification must share it promptly and unchanged with other relevant entities, such as healthcare institutions, to allow timely planning.
  • Application to System Packs: For devices used within system or procedure packs, manufacturers must inform relevant parties in the supply chain, who must then notify healthcare providers.

Source:

EC: Public Health - Latest Updates

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

EMA: Q&A Paper on Measures to Prevent Microbial Contamination of Non-Sterile Medicinal Products

EMA: Q&A Paper on Measures to Prevent Microbial Contamination of Non-Sterile Medicinal Products

The EMA has published a new Q&A paper on technical and organisational measures to prevent microbial contamination of non-sterile medicinal products.
Read more
When APS Fail and First Air is at Risk

When APS Fail and First Air is at Risk

At the PDA Good Aseptic Manufacturing Conference 2026, Alberto Gonzales (Takeda) discussed challenges and practical solutions related to aseptic process simulations (APS). Anna Campanella (Takeda) and Hussein Bachir (Franz Ziel) explored how first air protection in aseptic processing can be compromised by equipment design, glove interventions, and operator activities.
Read more
Why is import authorisation necessary for medicinal products entering the EU?

Why is import authorisation necessary for medicinal products entering the EU?

Read more
FDA: Updated Compliance Program for Preapproval Inspections

FDA: Updated Compliance Program for Preapproval Inspections

The FDA has revised its Compliance Program 7346.832, “Preapproval Inspections”. The updated program describes the planning, conduct and evaluation of preapproval inspections (PAIs) for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs).
Read more
EMA: Revised Q&A MRA EU-USA

EMA: Revised Q&A MRA EU-USA

The EMA has updated its Questions and Answers on the EU-US Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA). The update follows the completion of the FDA's assessment of all EU authorities responsible for GMP inspections of veterinary medicinal products on 29 May 2026.
Read more
WHO: Draft on Regulatory Ovesight of Disposal of Medical Products

WHO: Draft on Regulatory Ovesight of Disposal of Medical Products

WHO published a draft consultation document on regulatory oversight of disposal of medical products throughout the lifecycle.
Read more
Previous
Next