Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC: Q&A Information on Interruption or Discontinuation of Supply of Medical Devices

The European Commission has published a Q&A on practical aspects related to the implementation of the Article 10a obligation in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply of certain devices as introduced by Regulation (EU) 2024/1860 amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR).

This Q&A document is intended to facilitate the application of the above mentioned regulations as regards a gradual roll-out of Eudamed, the obligation to inform in case of interruption or discontinuation of supply, and transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices.


Summary of the Q&As:

  • Implementation Date: Article 10a obligations begin January 10, 2025. Interruptions anticipated before this date do not require reporting but may be voluntarily shared.
  • Scope of Obligation: Manufacturers, including those outside the EU, must inform relevant parties about anticipated supply interruptions. This applies to all devices (excluding custom-made devices) if supply issues could cause harm to patients or public health.
  • Obliged Parties to Inform: Manufacturers are required to notify economic operators, competent authorities, and healthcare institutions or professionals they directly supply. Economic operators must ensure that this information is passed further downstream without alteration.
  • Timing of Notification: Typically, manufacturers must notify at least six months before an anticipated supply interruption unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this.
  • Exceptional Circumstances: Unexpected events like natural disasters, raw material shortages, or financial challenges may allow manufacturers to notify with less than six months’ notice.
  • Defining Supply Interruptions: An interruption of supply should be understood as having a temporary inability to place individual devices of a given model or type on the Union market, with an expected duration of more than 60 days, as a general indication.
  • Reasons for Interruption: Manufacturers must specify reasons, which could include regulatory, manufacturing, supply chain, or business-related causes.
  • Risk of Serious Harm: Manufacturers must assess whether an interruption could cause serious harm, such as health risks or treatment delays, based on the device’s role and patient impact.
  • Data Confidentiality: Information provided to competent authorities is governed by MDR/IVDR confidentiality rules, although authorities may need to share details with healthcare entities.
  • Information Submission:I Notifications should be submitted using the forthcoming Manufacturer Information Form, and countries may provide specific submission instructions.
  • Responsibilities of Economic Operators: Economic operators who receive notification must share it promptly and unchanged with other relevant entities, such as healthcare institutions, to allow timely planning.
  • Application to System Packs: For devices used within system or procedure packs, manufacturers must inform relevant parties in the supply chain, who must then notify healthcare providers.

Source:

EC: Public Health - Latest Updates

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: New Draft Guidance on Impurity Specifications for Antibiotics

FDA: New Draft Guidance on Impurity Specifications for Antibiotics

The US FDA has issued a new draft guidance (April 2026) on Impurity Specifications for Antibiotics.
Read more
EDQM: Guidance on Traceability of Medicines in Hospitals

EDQM: Guidance on Traceability of Medicines in Hospitals

The EDQM has published new guidance on the traceability of medicines in hospital settings. The aim is to improve traceability up to the point of administration and strengthen patient safety.
Read more
Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) – Not Just an Extended Site Master File

Contamination Control Strategy (CCS) – Not Just an Extended Site Master File

At the GMP-PharmaCongress in Wiesbaden, GMP inspector Frank Sielaff (Regional Authority in Darmstadt, Germany) shared practical insights from recent inspections, high-lighting deficiencies in CCS implementation.

Read more
Which Measures are Crucial for Implementation and Monitoring of Data Integrity?

Which Measures are Crucial for Implementation and Monitoring of Data Integrity?

Here's the answer:
Read more
EMA/HMA: Call for Regulatory Updates for Radiopharmaceuticals

EMA/HMA: Call for Regulatory Updates for Radiopharmaceuticals

In their „Horizon Scanning Report“, EMA and HMA have recommended updates to the regulatory framework to keep pace with developments in radiopharmaceuticals. Due to their unique characteristics these products require specific regulatory and scientific approaches.
Read more
GMP Meets Radiation Protection – How Do They Fit Together?

GMP Meets Radiation Protection – How Do They Fit Together?

The manufacture of radiopharmaceuticals requires simultaneous compliance with the EU GMP Guide and radiation protection regulations, which can lead to conflicting objectives between product safety and personal protection. Technical solutions such as negative pressure systems and lead-lined cells, as well as early consultation with the authorities, are crucial for implementation that complies with both GMP and radiation protection requirements.
Read more
Previous
Next