Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

EC allows remote audits by notified bodies

On 11 January 2021, the European Commission (EC) announced what needs to be considered when Notified Bodies conduct remote audits of medical device and in vitro diagnostic manufacturers due to the COVID-19 situation.

In addition to the general delays caused by the pandemic, many manufacturers are increasingly concerned about the approaching deadlines for the MDR (May 2021) and IVDR (May 2022) coming into force.

The EC concluded that the need to prevent shortages of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics outweighs the risks of remote audits.

However, decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis. Travel restrictions and measures to control the pandemic in each country must be taken into account. A remote audit would be applicable where it "could prevent granting access or ensuring continued supply of devices to the market".

The EC points out once again that this regulation only applies as long as it is necessary and is not a blanket approval for replacing in-person audits with remote audits.

Notified bodies should take a risk-based approach and ensure that all of the manufacturer's technical documentation has been carefully reviewed. Details on how to perform remote audits are left to member states. Notified Bodies must inform the EC of the respective methods and the rationale for their use.


Source:

EC: Commission Notice

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

FDA: Draft Guidance on Responding to Form 483 Observations

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a draft guidance on responding to Form FDA-483 observations following drug CGMP inspections. The document provides recommendations on how manufacturers should structure their responses and what information they should include.
Read more
Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Which Quality and Process Parameters must Typically be Taken into Account During Process Validation for Terminally Sterilized Products?

Here's the answer:
Read more
Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Veterinary GMP 2026: The New Regulatory Framework

Implementing Regulations (EU) 2025/2091 and 2025/2154 consolidate the GMP requirements for veterinary medicinal products into a distinct and legally binding framework for the first time. While establishing regulatory independence for the veterinary sector, they remain substantively aligned with the EU GMP Guide.
Read more
Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB: Opportunities and Concerns in the MDR/IVDR Revision

Team-NB, the European association of medical device Notified Bodies, sees the proposed MDR and IVDR revision as an opportunity to improve efficiency, transparency and predictability in conformity assessment.
Read more
EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

EMA: GMP Documentation for the Sterilisation of an API

The EMA Q&A on the quality of medicines has been updated with a new question: “What kind of GMP documentation is required for an API manufacturer performing sterilisation of an active substance?”

Read more
EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

EMA: Updated Q&A on OOS Batches of ATMPs

The EMA has revised its questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification (OOS) batches of authorised cell- and tissue-based ATMPs (“Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based ATMPs”, Rev. 1, 2026).
Read more
Previous
Next