Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation

Swissmedic: Update of the Technical Interpretation for PQR

Swissmedic has published an updated version of its technical interpretation for a Product Quality Review (I-SMI.TI.14e).

This technical interpretation describes the minimal expectations as well as recommendations for establishing and evaluating a PQR, that inspectors of the competent regulatory authority can have when assessing compliance with the guidance during an inspection of a manufacturer of medicinal products, a manufacturer of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) for medicinal products or a marketing authorisation holder, in order to assure a harmonized conduct of inspections.

The changes to the previous version are:

  • Added: finished product (FP), MAH, Responsible Person, and Therapeutic products act (TPA).
  • Defined: "responsible person."
  • Text refinements; data comparison with previous reviews required; CAPAs must be documented in the Pharmaceutical Quality System.
  • Clarified responsibilities for PQR establishment; textual refinements; ensured partial PQRs are accessible to the manufacturer/MAH.
  • Clarified PQR evaluation responsibilities; refined country-specific aspects, including batch rejection/release data, change controls, contract reviews, CAPA evaluations, and stability program checks. Included batches temporarily authorized by Swissmedic.
  • Introduced a new chapter on PQR process review responsibilities.
  • Created a separate chapter for Technical Agreements.
  • Reduced PQR interval from 5 to 3 years for low or no production cases.
  • Clarified PQR establishment timelines for manufacturers and MAHs.
  • Introduced a new chapter on parallel imported products.

Source:

Swissmedic: Technical Interpretation I-SMI.TI.14e


Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

ICH: Updated Q9(R1) Briefing Pack

ICH: Updated Q9(R1) Briefing Pack

The ICH has fully revised the Q9(R1) Briefing Pack (March/April 2026) to align with the updated ICH Q9 guideline.
Read more
EMA: New Plans for the EU GMP Guide

EMA: New Plans for the EU GMP Guide

EMA published the GMDP Inspectors Working Group’s new 2026-2028 work plan and its 2025 annual report.
Read more
EMA: Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) Effectiveness Pilot Project

EMA: Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) Effectiveness Pilot Project

EMA launched a pilot under which EEA GMP inspectors will assess how sites demonstrate the effectiveness of their pharmaceutical quality system for risk-based change management, and whether the EEA GMP certificate could serve as the main evidence of this effectiveness.
Read more
EMA: Updated Guideline on Active Substance Chemistry

EMA: Updated Guideline on Active Substance Chemistry

The EMA has updated guidance on the information required for the manufacture and control of active substances used in medicinal products, with a 1 September 2026 date of application.
Read more
EMA: Q&A on the Implementation of 3DP Technology for Solid Oral Dosage Forms

EMA: Q&A on the Implementation of 3DP Technology for Solid Oral Dosage Forms

EMA added a new GMP/Q&A section on its website and published a dedicated Q&A document on 3D printing (3DP) for solid oral dosage forms.
Read more
Microbiological Monitoring – Sources of Contamination

Microbiological Monitoring – Sources of Contamination

All pharmaceutical dosage forms must be manufactured under controlled microbiological conditions. This requires microbial monitoring. This applies not only to sterile manufacturing, but also to facilities that manufacture non-sterile products.
Read more
Previous
Next