Skip to main content Skip to search Skip to main navigation
News: Europe

EU: “Forever Chemicals” in a Conflict of Interests

On 14 July 2026, the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) published a comprehensive briefing on PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as ‘forever chemicals’. The document is intended to serve as a technical basis for MEPs in their upcoming political decisions on PFAS regulation and summarises the current state of scientific knowledge, regulation and procedures.


What is the problem?

Due to their favourable physico-chemical properties, PFAS are valuable for countless applications and products – including in the pharmaceutical sector. On the other hand, they pose an enormous challenge to the environment and human health: PFAS are persistent and have been detected worldwide in soil, water, food, wildlife and humans. Given the extent of contamination and the limitations of technically complex and costly remediation, scientists and regulatory authorities regard preventing further environmental pollution – i.e. regulating PFAS at source – as the most sustainable option.


What solutions are being discussed?

Due to the vast number of PFAS, regulating each individual compound is not feasible. The EU Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability therefore proposes regulating PFAS as a group. The European Chemicals Agency is currently reviewing a draft restriction under the EU Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), which covers around 10,000 compounds. This would, in principle, prohibit the manufacture, placing on the market and use of PFAS, but provides for transition periods and sector-specific exemptions for applications where no suitable alternatives are currently available.


What happens next?

The European Chemicals Agency is expected to submit its final opinion to the European Commission by the end of 2026. The European Parliament will examine the Commission’s draft restriction. The European Commission will then present a concrete regulatory proposal for further deliberation.

The EPRS briefing highlights the key conflict of objectives:

  • Reducing risks to the environment and health through far-reaching restrictions
  • Whilst safeguarding critical applications and taking strategic industrial sectors into account


Quelle:

EP: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PDF)

Meet the GMP Compliance Adviser

The GMP Compliance Adviser is the world's largest knowledge portal for quality management in the pharma business. 

The demo access is non-binding and ends automatically.

Test it now for free

You may also be interested in the following articles:

News: EMA

EMA Clarifies Batch Numbering for Parallel-Traded Medicines

EMA updated its GMP/GDP Q&A collection by revising the answer to Question 4 concerning Chapter 5 of the EU GMP Guide. It explains which batch numbers should appear on the packaging of parallel-traded medicines.

Read more
Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Cleaning Validation: When PDE Reports and the Worst-Case Selection do not Align

Robust PDE reports form the basis of risk-based cleaning validation. This article highlights common deficiencies identified during GMP inspections and explains how they can be avoided.

Read more
Question of the Week | GMP-Verlag

Why is it Important to use Consistent Microbiological Air Monitoring Methods in Pharmaceutical Cleanrooms?

Here's the answer:
Read more
News: Europe

EDQM: New Working Party on 3D-printed Medicinal Products

The European Pharmacopoeia Commission (EPC) approved the creation of a working party on 3D-printed medicinal products. Its aim is to support the development of appropriate quality standards in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.).
Read more
EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

EMA: 14 New Nitrosamines for Appendix 1

Appendix 1 of EMA’s Questions and Answers on nitrosamine impurities has been updated. This appendix contains acceptable intakes (AIs) established for N-nitrosamines.
Read more
WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO: Draft Revision of its Guidelines on Quality Risk Management

WHO published a revised draft of its “WHO guidelines on quality risk management”. Working document QAS/26.994 is open for public comment until 15 November 2026.
Read more
Previous
Next