• gmp-verlag.de
  • GMP Compliance Adviser Login
  • Shopping cart
Stay informed!

You’d like to be regularly informed on the latest developments in Good Manufacturing Practices?

 

Subscribe to our free GMP Newsletter LOGFILE!

>>> REGISTER NOW

TOP 5 GMP Downloads

1. Questionnaire for preparing GMP-inspections
More than 650 typical questions related to audits and inspections.


2. GMP Fundamentals
A quick and comprehensive overview of the complex world of GMP.


3. GDP Audit Questionnaire
More than 700 questions with reference to regulations.


4. A Pharma Guide to Cleaning Validation
How to meet Agency Expectations and Establish Accepted Limits.


5. Data Integrity in the EU
Requirements for Quality Management Systems.


>>> More Downloads
GMP Compliance Adviser

GMP in Practice: 24 chapters written by internationally renowned industry experts.

 

GMP Regulations: 8 chapters with the most important GMP guidelines and regulations.

 

Image

>>> READ MORE

Award
Image
The New USP <1231>
Water for Pharmaceutical Purposes

a detailed Overview

>>> ORDER NOW

GMP LOGFILE Features

2018-11-21

LOGFILE No. 43/2018 – Paradigm shift in the establishment of limits for the validation of cleaning processes)

Paradigm shift in the establishment of limits for the validation of cleaning processes

An excerpt from the GMP Series Download A Pharma Guide to Cleaning Validation

5 minutes reading time

by Jens Hrach, PhD

 

Requirements for the establishment of limit values first appeared in the FDA Guide to Inspections of Validation of Cleaning Processes in 1993: "The firm's rationale for the residue limits established should be logical based on the manufacturer's knowledge of the materials involved and be practical, achievable, and verifiable. It is important to define the sensitivity of the analytical methods in order to set reasonable limits. Some limits that have been mentioned by industry representatives […] include analytical detection levels such as  10 PPM, biological activity levels such as  1/1000 of the normal therapeutic dose, and organoleptic levels such as no visible  residue”.

The following three established acceptance criteria were used routinely in the years that followed:

  • The 1/1000 of the dose criterion: no more than 0.1% of the normal therapeutic dose of any product will appear in the maximum daily dose of the following product.
  • The 10-ppm criterion: No more than 10 ppm of any product will appear in another product.
  • The visually clean criterion: after cleaning, residues may not be visible on the production equipment. The visibility limit for many substances is approximately 4 µg/cm2.

PIC/S PI 006-3 recommended that the strictest of these criteria should be used in a worst-case scenario.

These acceptance criteria became the subject of criticism because they are based on assumptions that have no scientific basis. The substance-specific properties are not taken into account in the case of the 10-ppm and "visually clean" criteria, because the limitation is based purely on quantity. In the case of the 1/1000 of the dose criterion, the therapeutic dose is taken into consideration; however, it says nothing about other potential effects of the active ingredient. As the number of newly developed highly active substances increased, the calls for a new scientifically based approach to the establishment of limit values for cleaning validations became louder.

The first Concept Paper called "Dealing with the Need for Updated GMP Guidance Concerning Dedicated Manufacturing Facilities in the Manufacture of Certain Medicinal Products" published by the EU Commission and the EMA in 2005 had already pointed out the need for science-based risk analysis to be the basis for the establishment of limit values for cleaning validations. However, it took an additional 10 years for this subject to be included in the final EMA guideline.

In 2010, the ISPE (International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering) published its recommendations on establishing limit values, the so-called Risk-MaPP ("Risk-Based Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products – A Guide to Managing Risks Associated with Cross-Contamination").

With the revision of the requirements in the EU GMP Guidelines (Chapter 3, Chapter 5 and Annex 15) and the introduction of the so-called PDE guideline of the EMA ("Guideline on setting health based exposure limits for use in risk identification in the manufacture of different medicinal products in shared facilities"), the previously valid and officially accepted acceptance criteria became obsolete and have been gradually replaced by the PDE value (Permitted Daily Exposure).

The PIC/S (Pharmaceutical Inspection Cooperation Scheme) has aligned its GMP Guide PE 009 with the revised Annex 15 of the EU GMP Guidelines for validation and qualification. This document is the equivalent of the EU GMP Guidelines for the countries that belong to the PIC/S.

It is expected that the PIC/S document on qualification and validation (PIC/S PI 006) will be revised to reflect the new requirements.

Current statutory requirements

What exactly do the regulations say and what does this mean for the establishment of limit values for use during the cleaning validation?

Section 3 of Chapter 3 "Premises and Equipment" of the EU GMP Guidelines states that dedicated facilities are required for medicinal products when

  • the risk cannot be adequately controlled by operational and/or technical measures
  • scientific data does not allow deriving a limit value (e .g. allergenic potential...), or
  • the limit values derived from the toxicological assessment are below the detection limit of the analytical method.

Chapter 5 "Production" also contains several sections that deal with the prevention of cross-contamination (5.17 to 5.21). These sections also refer to the toxicological assessment of the substances during the risk management process (5.20). The choice of technical measures and equipment should be based on this assessment process.

The list of technical and organisational measures to prevent cross-contamination (section 5.21) in the previous version of Chapter 5 has been expanded from 7 to 23 measures. What is interesting here is that not only a dedicated production line is permitted, but dedicated equipment and equipment parts also. Dedicating by separation in time (campaign-based) is one of the points listed under organisational measures. It remains to be seen to what extent these new possibilities will establish themselves and be implemented during routine operation.

The above-mentioned issues were also included in Chapter 10 "Cleaning Validation" of
Annex 15 "Qualification and Validation" of the EU GMP Guidelines. It states that the visually clean acceptance criterion alone is no longer acceptable (10.2). The previously used 1/1000 dose or 10 ppm acceptance criteria are not even mentioned. Limit values for cross-contamination should be based on a toxicological assessment (10.6). It is also stated that this assessment should be documented in written form with supporting references included. The specification of a limit value without appropriate justification and without stating the data sources will no longer be acceptable. It is expected that companies will be able to provide scientific justification for the limit values they use. An additional document, the so-called PDE Guideline, provides more detailed information on the methodology.

It is important to note that according to Annex 15, the cleaning agents used when cleaning the equipment also require scientifically justified limit values. 10.6 states: "Limits should be established for the removal of any cleaning agents used." That a scientifically justified approach must be taken is clear from the glossary. The glossary states: "Cleaning validation is documented evidence that an approved cleaning procedure will reproducibly remove the previous product or cleaning agents used in the equipment below the scientifically set maximum allowable carryover level."

It is interesting that a "scientifically set maximum allowable carryover level" is also stipulated here. This once again confirms that the 10-ppm criterion and the 1/1000 dose criterion should no longer be used when establishing limit values for the validation of cleaning processes.

In conclusion, it can be said that the new version of Annex 15 and Chapters 3 and 5 of the EU GMP Guidelines represent a comprehensive refocussing of substance assessment during cleaning validation. The term acceptance criteria as well as the corresponding limit values based on the 1/1000 dose criterion and the 10 ppm criterion will gradually disappear and be replaced by scientifically based limit values. The PDE value is used as a basis for determining the maximum allowable carryover (MACO) of the cross-contaminant (API or cleaning agents) in the next product.

LOGFILE-43-Cleaning-Validation-Establishment-of-Limits.pdf


Source:

This text is an excerpt from the GMP Series Download A Pharma Guide to Cleaning Validation

Image

Does your cleaning validation meet the current requirements of Annex 15 to the EU GMP Guidelines? And are you already familiar with the new requirements for establishing limits in cleaning validation?

Cleaning validation is not new, but the official requirements were updated in the revised Annex 15 in order to reflect the current state of the art. Three aspects are in the foreground:

  • The lifecycle of the process should be taken in consideration.
  • A quality risk management approach should be applied.
  • Limits for the carryover of product residues should be based on a
    toxicological evaluation (PDE report).
The Pharma Guide to Cleaning Validation will show you exactly what 'done correctly' is. The report includes:
  • Regulatory aspects
  • Cleaning process requirements
  • Risk management
  • Design phase
  • Validation phase
  • Ongoing verification/revalidation
  • Documentation
  • PDE Guideline of the EMA
  • Calculating the maximum allowable carryover
  • Visually clean
  • Microbiological state

Every page offers practical strategies to implement an up-to-date cleaning validation and meet regulatory requirements.

Author:

Jens Hrach, PhD
European Registered Toxicologist , DGPT
Dr. Jens Hrach Consulting
E-mail: mail@jenshrach.de
Comments
No comment has yet been written about this news.
 
 
Literature recommendation
Qualification and Validation: Agency Expectations
GMP Compliance Adviser
Single User Licence (monthly subscription)
Inspection of Process Validation