Excerpt from the GMP Compliance Adviser, Chapter 20.F.5.14
At a glance: the most common GMP deficiencies at active substance manufacturers | |
Deviations |
Insufficient documentation of deviations Inadequate root cause analyses Lack of risk assessment with regard to further potentially impacted batches Insufficient qualification/training of the employees |
Quality Risk Management |
No systematic approach Superficial risk assessments Insufficient follow-up of actions from risk analyses |
Product Quality Review |
No in-depth assessment of the available data Lack of evaluation of the effectiveness of corrective actions Insufficient evaluation of returns PQRs are prepared too late. |
Personnel |
Insufficient compliance with hygiene regulations Inadequate training of external service providers |
Water |
Insufficient monitoring Lack of rationale for setting warning and action limits Insufficient actions taken when limits are exceeded |
Documentation and protocols |
Violations of ALCOA rules and data integrity requirements for electronic systems. |
Materials management |
Inadequate pest control measures Insufficient sampling conditions Insufficient qualification suppliers of raw materials, active substance starting materials and intermediates |
Production |
Measures to prevent contamination at different stages of production are inconsistent. Lack of definition of the maximum campaign length Lack of definition of holding times of uncleaned or cleaned equipment |
Packaging and labelling |
Insufficient controls before starting the packaging process |
Laboratory controls |
Shortcomings in the examination of OOS results Stability samples not stored in containers that mimic market containers. |
Cleaning validation |
Insufficient consideration of possible microbiological or endotoxin contamination Insufficient care in the identification of worst case products and the selection of sampling points |
Returns |
Inadequate procedures for handling returns |
Figure 20.F-24 Common GMP deficiencies at active substance manufacturers
Thematically, there is thus a striking overlap here with the deficiencies found during GMP inspections of medicinal product manufacturers (see 21.C Frequent deficiencies in GMP inspections, their recurring pitfalls and how to avoid them). From the author's point of view, the production of active substances generally takes place at a high level; with regard to the fulfillment of the respective GMP requirements, active substance manufacturers are not necessarily in a worse position than medicinal product manufacturers.
Due to the increasing use of electronic systems, it is to be expected that deficiencies in the area of documentation or, for example, the handling of deviations and OOS results will be identified and avoided more quickly in the future. However, this will also result in new sources of errors and requirements, especially with regard to the validation of electronic systems and the maintenance of data integrity. From the author's point of view, the focus of audits at active ingredient manufacturers will certainly continue to shift in the direction of checking these requirements.
The GMP Compliance Adviser is the most comprehensive GMP online knowledge portal worldwide, combining theory and practice in a successful way.
GMP in Practice: "How-to-do"-interpretations and knowledge of our noted industry specialists and according to international GMP regulations.
GMP Regulations: The most important GMP regulations from Europe, USA, Japan and many more (e.g. PIC/S, ICH, WHO,...).
You might also be interested in the following articles